MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416017013 · doi:10.1145/3746252.3761273

Bidirectional Temporal-Aware Modeling with Multi-Scale Mixture-of-Experts for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting

2025· article· W4416017013 on OpenAlexaff
Boming Zhao, Haocheng Peng, Hujun Bao, Jiashu Zhao, Zhaopeng Cui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTimestampMultivariate statisticsTime seriesFocus (optics)Feature (linguistics)Series (stratigraphy)Temporal database

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in deep learning have significantly boosted performance in multivariate time series forecasting (MTSF). While many existing approaches focus on capturing inter-variable (a.k.a. channel-wise) correlations to improve prediction accuracy, the temporal dimension, particularly its rich structural and contextual information, remains underexplored. In this paper, we propose BIM3, a novel framework that integrates BIdirectional temporal-aware modeling with Multi-Scale Mixture-of-Experts for MTSF. First, unlike existing methods that treat historical and future temporal information independently, we introduce a novel Timestamp Dual Cross-Attention Module, which employs a symmetric cross-attention mechanism to explicitly capture bidirectional temporal dependencies through timestamp interactions. Second, to address the complex and scale-varying temporal patterns commonly found in multivariate time series, we move beyond recent multi-scale forecasting models that share parameters across all channels and fail to capture channel-specific dynamics. Instead, we design a Multi-Scale Feature Extract Mixture-of-Experts module that adaptively routes time series to specialized experts based on their temporal characteristics. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world datasets show that BIM3 consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, highlighting its effectiveness in capturing both temporal structure and inter-variable diversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207