Discovery and chemical biology of CDK8 inhibitors reveals insights for kinase inhibitor development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Protein kinase inhibitors are a key class of targeted cancer therapies, but finding compounds that show on-target efficacy with minimal toxicity remains challenging. CDK8 and CDK19 are paralogous kinases that regulate Mediator complex to promote transcriptional responses to extracellular signals and have also been reported to facilitate genome replication. Preclinical studies show that CDK8/19 inhibitors may have therapeutic benefit in several cancers, but whether effective inhibition of Mediator kinases is cytotoxic is debated. Here, we present a multi-modal approach for discovery of specific kinase inhibitors, and find that most CDK8/19 inhibitors show off-target toxicity and/or insufficient on-target engagement in cells. We describe several novel high affinity CDK8/19 inhibitors, report that loss of CDK8/19 activity is not cytotoxic but reduces cell proliferation without affecting DNA replication, and provide evidence that most inhibitors can bind in type I or type II modes. Our approach is applicable to any kinase inhibitor development program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".