MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416022145 · doi:10.1016/j.gore.2025.101988

Use of doxorubicin and trabectedin in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A case report

2025· article· en· W4416022145 on OpenAlexaff
Délya Valcourt‐Gendron, Basile Tessier‐Cloutier, Xing Zeng, Reitan Ribeiro, Shuk On Annie Leung, Victoria Mandilaras, Lili Fu, Tuyet Nhung Ton Nu, Lara Richer, Lucy Gilbert, Laurence Bernard

Bibliographic record

VenueGynecologic Oncology Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrabectedinDoxorubicinMalignancyChemotherapyStromal cellDiseaseToxicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is the most common type of endometrial stromal malignancy, yet treatment options are limited, particularly in advanced or recurrent cases that are resistant to hormonal therapy. Case Presentation: We describe a 48-year-old patient with recurrent stage IVB LG-ESS who was treated with a combination of doxorubicin and trabectedin, followed by trabectedin maintenance; a protocol extrapolated from leiomyosarcoma treatment. Following failure to hormonal therapy, this regimen demonstrated disease stabilization, particularly in pelvic metastases. Conclusion: Our results highlight the potential role of this chemotherapy combination in hormonal therapy-resistant LG-ESS, a malignancy with limited systemic therapeutic options. This is the first reported case of LG-ESS achieving prolonged stable disease with doxorubicin-trabectedin therapy and trabectedin maintenance. Given the manageable toxicity profile and encouraging tumor control, further studies should explore its potential role in LG-ESS management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGynecologic Oncology ReportsSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207