Turnaround Strategies and Performance of Commercial Banks in Nairobi City County, Kenya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Global financial markets have experienced significant volatility over the past decade, compelling commercial banks to adopt turnaround strategies for survival and growth.In Kenya, the banking sector has faced notably challenges, with performance indicators declining sharply during the COVID-19 pandemic and liquidity issues leading to multiple bank receiverships.This study examined the effect of four turnaround strategies;cost reduction, asset management, diversification, and modernization;on the performance of commercial banks in Nairobi City County, Kenya.The research employed a descriptive design, collecting primary data through structured questionnaires from 64 senior managers and strategic planners across 38 commercial banks, achieving a 91.43% response rate.Bank performance was assessed through non-financial indicators including customer loyalty, service quality, customer satisfaction, and product variety.Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the four turnaround strategies collectively explained 53.7% of variance in bank performance (R = .537,F(4, 59) = 17.083, p< .001).Cost reduction emerged as the strongest performance predictor ( = .619,p< .001),demonstrating that strategic cost management through selective resource reallocation rather than blanket expense cuts significantly enhances performance.Asset management showed moderate but significant positive effects ( = .204,p = .044),though concerns about inadequate risk management raised sustainability questions.Unexpectedly, diversification demonstrated non-significant negative relationships with performance ( = -.047,p = .641),suggesting that extensive diversification may dilute organizational focus and spread resources too thinly across unfamiliar territories without requisite expertise.Similarly, modernization showed no significant performance impact ( = .102,p = .331),indicating that when all banks pursue similar modernization strategies, these investments become competitive necessities rather than performance differentiators.The findings challenge conventional assumptions about turnaround strategy universality and highlight that implementation quality, environmental fit, and organizational capabilities critically determine strategy effectiveness.The study contributes valuable insights for banking practitioners and policymakers, demonstrating that successful turnaround requires carefully selecting and integrating approaches that align with organizational strengths, market conditions, and competitive dynamics within Kenya's evolving banking landscape rather than merely implementing multiple strategies simultaneously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".