MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416026758 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114382

Spectral remote sensing reveals forest structural characteristics resilient to spruce budworm infestations

2025· article· en· W4416026758 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tommaso Trotto, Nicholas C. Coops, Alexis Achim, Sarah E. Gergel

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Indicators · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpruce budwormBasal areaDisturbance (geology)CanopyVegetation (pathology)Resilience (materials science)Forest restorationForest management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Spectral indexes derived from Landsat can capture forest resilience to infestations. • Pre-disturbance forest structure modulates resilience to spruce budworm infestations. • Infestation impact is lower in shorter, sparser, and lower basal area stands. • Recover is faster in greenness, followed by structure and vegetation water content. • Resilience quantification can be operationalized to inform management strategies. Forests are increasingly influence by natural disturbance, which are intensifying under climate change, threatening the sustainability of natural resources. Resilience is a central component in these dynamics, defined as the ability of forests to recover from a disturbance and return to a pre-disturbed state. Recent conceptual frameworks describe resilience as a combination of disturbance impact and recovery rate offering a more unified and quantitative approach. However, these frameworks often do not consider how forest characteristics and their spatio-temporal variability shape resilience outcomes. In this study, we leveraged three decades of Landsat time series data to quantify forest resilience to spruce budworm (SBW) infestations, a major defoliator of fir and spruce forests in Quebec, Canada. We applied a two-stage clustering analysis to investigate how pre-disturbance forest structures, including canopy height, cover, basal area, cumulative defoliation severity, and age influence resilience. Resilience was quantified via impact and recovery rate of three key spectral indexes: Green Normalized Vegetation Index (GNDVI, greenness), Moisture Stress Index (MSI, vegetation water content), and Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR, structural characteristics) following the 2006 outbreak. Our results revealed that stands with lower basal area, sparser, and shorter canopies were more resilience to SBW over time. Greenness recovered most rapidly, followed by structural development and vegetation water content. Ultimately, stands showed greater resilient in greenness and structural development than vegetation water content throughout the infestation. These findings advance empirical understanding of forest resilience and can inform management strategies to maintain and enhance Canada’s boreal forest resilience to increasing SBW pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcological IndicatorsSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207