MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MUTE-DSS: A digital-twin-based decision support system for minimizing underwater radiated noise in ship voyage planning

2025· article· en· W4416027601 on OpenAlexafffund
Akash Venkateshwaran, Indu Kant Deo, Rajeev K. Jaiman

Bibliographic record

VenueOcean Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaMitacsTransport CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsDecision support systemNoise (video)AdaptabilityUnderwaterProfiling (computer programming)SonarGenetic algorithmNoise reductionUnderwater acoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel MUTE-DSS, a digital-twin-based decision support system for minimizing underwater radiated noise (URN) during ship voyage planning. The system is built on the Robot Operating System (ROS2), an open-source middleware framework designed for modular, distributed, and real-time communication between software components. The framework integrates near-field acoustic modeling using a semi-empirical spectrum with 3D ray tracing for far-field propagation, enabling real-time ship noise prediction and whale distribution tracking. The proposed DSS performs a two-stage optimization pipeline: Batch Informed Trees for collision-free ship routing and a genetic algorithm for adaptive ship speed profiling under voyage constraints that minimizes cumulative URN exposure to marine mammals. The effectiveness of MUTE-DSS is demonstrated through case studies of ships operating between the Strait of Georgia and the Strait of Juan de Fuca, comparing optimized voyages against baseline trajectories derived from automatic identification system data. Results show substantial reductions in noise exposure level, up to 7.14 dB, corresponding to approximately an 80.68 % reduction in a simplified scenario, and an average 4.90 dB reduction, corresponding to approximately a 67.6 % reduction in a more realistic dynamic setting. These results illustrate the adaptability and practical utility of the proposed decision support system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOcean EngineeringSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207