Creative nostalgia, the structure of feeling of contemporary times
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proposition d'ouvrage collectif en anglais en cours d'évaluation par l'éditeur américain Cambridge Scholars Publishing sous la direction d'Adrian Scribano (1 auteur, Professeur de sociologie de la Universidad de Buenos Aires), Fabio La Rocca (2 auteur, MDC de Sociologie, UPVM3), Daniela Pomarico (3 auteur, ATER de Sociologie, UPVM3) intitulé : Nostalgia. Contemporary reflections in sociology.Titre du chapitre proposé : Pomarico, D., Creative nostalgia, the structure of feeling of contemporary times.Liste des auteurs : -Préface : Katharina Niemeyer (Directrice du site du CELAT à l'UQAM | Professeure à l'École des médias de l'Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM).-Emmanuelle Fantin (MDC, Sorbonne-Université (CELSA).-Daniela Pomarico (ATER de Sociologie, UPVM3)-Claudia Attimonelli (MDC de Sociosémiotique et communication, Università degli Studi Aldo Moro di Bari, Italie).-Vincenzo Susca, (Professeur de Sociologie, UPVM3).-Adrian Scribano (Professeur de Sociologie, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET-IIGG-UBA).-Fabio La Rocca (MDC de Sociologie, UPVM3).-Juan A. Roche Cárcel (Professeur de Sociologie, Universidad de Alicante, Espagne).-Maximiliano E. Korstanje (Professeur d’Economie, Universidad de Palermo, Argentine).-Angélica De Sena (CONICET-UNLam / UBA) and Maria Victoria Sordini (CONICET UNDMP), Univerdidad de Buenos Aires, Argentine. -Alexis Sossa (MDC de Sociologie, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chili).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it