MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416032164 · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000006118

Executive Summary of the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit

2025· article· en· W4416032164 on OpenAlexaff
Jill M. Krapf, Paul J. Yong, Marlene D Berke, Nina Bohm‐Starke, Jacob Bornstein, Emanuelle Chrysilla, Megan L. Falsetta, David Foster, S Goldstein, Michael J. Iadarola, Susan Kellogg‐Spadt, Andrew J. Mannes, Andrew T. Goldstein

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVulvodyniaSummitAgonistResiniferatoxinNeuroinflammationTamoxifen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current treatment of provoked vestibulodynia involving neuroproliferation is often complete vestibulectomy; however, less invasive treatments are biologically plausible, yet lack study. The International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, the National Vulvodynia Association, the Gynecologic Cancers Research Foundation, and Tight Lipped, a grassroots nonprofit organization that supports people with chronic vulvovaginal and pelvic pain, collectively sponsored a conference, the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit, held in April 2024. The primary objective of the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit was to identify options for further research of the treatment of provoked vestibulodynia through expert consensus. After the conference, attendees scored the presented therapeutics in rank order, leading to a hierarchy of merit. Fifteen therapeutic options were presented and ranked in order of most promising to least promising for further study on treating the neuroinflammation of provoked vestibulodynia. The top identified therapeutics for further research were: 1) ketotifen fumarate (mast cell stabilizer with potential to prevent mast cell activation), 2) resiniferatoxin (transient receptor vanilloid 1 agonist causing chemo-inactivation of nerve terminals), 3) specialized pro-resolving mediators or strategies to boost their levels (eg, maresin 1 and 1-trifluoromethoxy-phenyl-3-[1-propionylpiperidin-4-yl] urea), 4) luteolin (flavonoid with potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective properties), 5) alpha-lipoic acid (antioxidant with nerve-specific anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing qualities), and 6) NGFR121W -SNAP IR700 trimer exposed to near-infared light (photoablation targeting nociceptors and sparing surrounding tissue). This executive summary describes the rationale for identifying specific pharmacologic agents and medical devices as targets for research directed toward treatment of the neuroinflammatory process found in the vestibular mucosa of provoked vestibulodynia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrics and GynecologySame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207