MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416032321 · doi:10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100823

The risk factors of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4416032321 on OpenAlex
Ning-Xia Yu, Shu-Guang Yang, Xueqing Yu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYoung Scientists FundNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLungInterstitial lung diseaseDiffuse alveolar damageCytoplasmMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis (AAV) is an immune-mediated disease characterized by Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA) positivity. Patients with AAV are known to be at high risk for the occurrence of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). The authors aimed to explore the risk factors in patients with AAV-ILD to enhance awareness among the public and healthcare providers, and to facilitate the timely adoption of effective strategies for prevention and management. METHODS: The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), the WanFang Database, Chinese biomedical literature service system (SinoMed), and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) for studies that focused on the risk factors in patients with AAV-ILD from database inception to 21 September 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The authors used a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model to evaluate the underlying risk factors of AAV-ILD. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included, including 13 case-control studies, 5 cohort studies, and 7 cross-sectional studies, respectively. The authors identified preliminary risk factors for AAV-ILD, including age, male, smoking history, KL-6, ESR, MPO-ANCA, cough, dyspnea, and HRCT findings such as honeycombing, interlobular septal thickening, and lattice shadows, Ear, nose & throat involvement, Hb, alb, BVAS, and fever. The study design type, follow-up (time), Country, sample, type of AAV, quality score, and were initially considered not to be sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: This study has preliminarily identified multiple risk factors associated with ILD in AAV patients, encompassing sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors. While these findings may serve as a reference for further investigation, large-scale prospective cohort studies or longitudinal research remain necessary for validation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024592874.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it