MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416032932 · doi:10.1002/hbm.70406

Brain Connectivity Gradients Alterations in Discordant Cerebrospinal Fluid Profile for Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers

2025· article· en· W4416032932 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lorenzo Pini, Chiara Tuzzato, Alessandra Griffa, Lorenza Brusini, Federica Cruciani, Gilles Allali, Maurizio Corbetta, Gloria Menegaz, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Brain Mapping · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenentechNational Institutes of HealthEisai CanadaH. Lundbeck A/SServierSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationAlzheimer's AssociationFujirebio USDoD Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativePfizerBiogenBioClinicaEisaiFondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e RovigoF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaMinistero della SaluteNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationU.S. Department of DefenseEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbFoundation for the National Institutes of HealthGE HealthcareAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaTakeda Pharmaceutical CompanyAbbVieNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCerebrospinal fluidDiffusion MRILogistic regressionDiscriminative modelConnectomeFunctional connectivityNeuroimagingLinear regressionBrain mappingDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by brain accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aß, simplified as A for the AD biological model) and tau (T) proteins, with Aß emerging first. However, a significant proportion of individuals exhibit discordant biomarkers' profiles, such as elevated phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181) with normal Aß42 from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), posing diagnostic and mechanistic challenges. This study investigated whether functional and structural brain connectivity can distinguish individuals with discordant CSF profiles (A-T+) from those with concordant patterns (A+T+), hypothesizing that distinct connectivity patterns may reflect early divergent pathophysiological processes. Data from cognitively unimpaired or mildly impaired individuals in the ADNI3 repository were analyzed, selecting those with resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) and/or diffusion MRI (dMRI) within 18 months of CSF testing for Aß and p-tau181. Participants were grouped into A-T+ or A+T+ groups. Structural and functional connectivity gradients were generated for each participant and summarized using a Euclidean distance measure from reference gradient templates derived from cognitively unimpaired individuals without pathology (A-T-). We applied linear mixed models and analysis of variance to assess connectivity-based gradient differences between A-T+ and A+T+ groups, adjusting for relevant variables. Classification analyzes using logistic regression and support vector machine, along with feature importance via the Boruta algorithm, evaluated the discriminative power of gradient connectivity profiles. Multimodal integration was performed using partial least square canonical analysis (PLSC), and relationships between gradients and cognition were assessed via UMAP-based dimensionality reduction and bootstrapped linear regressions. Results were compared with a classical network analysis examining within- and between-network connectivity differences. Among 424 participants, n = 67 were classified as A-T+, n = 106 as A+T+, and n = 56 as cognitively healthy A-T-. The remaining 195 participants (n = 86 A+T+ and n = 109 cognitively impaired A-T-) were not included. A-T+ individuals (age = 75 ± 8.2) exhibited less cognitive impairment but greater functional connectivity gradients' distance to the reference templates (false discovery rate-corrected p < 0.05) in the temporo-occipital axis compared to A+T+ (age = 76.1 ± 7.7). Structural connectivity differences were not significant. FC-based models classified A-T+ and A+T+ with good accuracy (AUC = 0.77), loading on the same temporo-occipital regions, unlike SC (AUC = 0.52). The posterior brain involvement in A-T+ was confirmed by PLSC analyzes. A+T+ individuals showed a significant relation between cognitive scores and functional connectivity, primarily mapping the default mode network (DMN). A shift was observed in relation to executive functions and functional connectivity in A-T+. Discordant CSF profiles (A-T+) exhibit distinct functional connectivity patterns, particularly in posterior brain regions, compared to concordant CSF patterns (A+T+), which are characterized by a significant cognitive-DMN connectivity association. These results suggest that CSF p-tau181 accumulation in the absence of Aß42 may be associated with specific functional trajectories, suggesting specific pathophysiological patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Brain MappingSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207