MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416040060 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2514428

Evolocumab in Patients without a Previous Myocardial Infarction or Stroke

2025· article· en· W4416040060 on OpenAlexaff
Erin A. Bohula, Nicholas Marston, Ajay Bhatia, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Lawrence A. Leiter, José Carlos Nicolau, Jeong-Gun Park, Julia Kuder, Sabina A. Murphy, Huei Wang, V. Bláha, Andrzej Budaj, Jan H. Cornel, Assen Goudev, Róbert Gábor Kiss, Alberto Lorenzatti, Alexander Parkhomenko, Marcoli Cyrille, Gabriel Paiva da Silva Lima, E. Magnus Ohman, Robert P. Giugliano, Marc S. Sabatine

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersAmgen
KeywordsEvolocumabMyocardial infarctionDiabetes mellitusStroke (engine)PCSK9Placebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor evolocumab reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with a previous myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral artery disease. The effect of evolocumab on the risk of MACE among patients without a previous myocardial infarction or stroke is unknown. METHODS: We conducted an international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab in patients with atherosclerosis or diabetes and without a previous myocardial infarction or stroke who had a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of at least 90 mg per deciliter. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive evolocumab at a dose of 140 mg every 2 weeks or placebo. The two primary end points were a composite of death from coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke (3-point MACE) and a composite of 3-point MACE or ischemia-driven arterial revascularization (4-point MACE). RESULTS: A total of 12,257 patients were randomly assigned to receive evolocumab (6129 patients) or placebo (6128) and were included in the efficacy analyses. The median age of the patients was 66 years, 43% were women, and 93% were White. The median follow-up was 4.6 years. A 3-point MACE event occurred in 336 patients (5-year Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.2%) in the evolocumab group, as compared with 443 (8.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.86; P<0.001). A 4-point MACE event occurred in 747 patients (5-year Kaplan-Meier estimate, 13.4%) in the evolocumab group, as compared with 907 (16.2%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.89; P<0.001). No evidence of a between-group difference was seen in the incidence of safety events. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab led to a lower risk of first cardiovascular events than placebo among patients with atherosclerosis or diabetes and without a previous myocardial infarction or stroke. (Funded by Amgen; VESALIUS-CV ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03872401.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of MedicineSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207