MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416045799 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.15440

Counting $\mathbb F_q$-points of orbital varieties in ad-nilpotent ideals of type $A_n$

2025· preprint· en· W4416045799 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohammad Bardestani, Keivan Mallahi-Karai, Samrith Ram, Hadi Salmasian

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRussian Science FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsType (biology)SubalgebraPartition (number theory)Triangular matrixUpper and lower boundsIdeal (ethics)Order (exchange)Product (mathematics)Function (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $\mathfrak b_n(\mathbb F_q)$ denote the Lie algebra of upper triangular $n\times n$ matrices over the finite field $\mathbb F_q$, and let $\mathfrak u_n(\mathbb F_q)$ be the nilradical of $\mathfrak b_n$. For every $\mathfrak b_n(\mathbb F_q)$-stable ideal $\mathfrak a$ of $\mathfrak u_n(\mathbb F_q)$, and every partition $μ$ of $n$, we prove two formulas for the number of elements of $\mathfrak a$ of Jordan type $μ$: the first one is the Hall scalar product of a modified Hall-Littlewood function indexed by $μ$ and a chromatic quasisymmetric function associated to $\mathfrak a$, and the second one is in terms of an explicit collection of standard tableaux. In the special case that $\mathfrak a$ is the nilradical $\mathfrak u_Λ(\mathbb F_q)$ of the parabolic subalgebra associated to a composition $Λ$ of $n$, our first formula reduces to a result of Karp and Thomas: up to an explicit polynomial factor in $q$, the number of elements in $\mathfrak u_Λ(\mathbb F_q)$ of Jordan type $μ$ is equal to the coefficient of the monomial $\mathsf x^Λ$ in the specialization of the dual Macdonald symmetric function $\mathrm Q_{μ'}(\mathsf x;q^{-1},t)$ at $t=0$. We give three applications: (1) a formula for the number of points of a nilpotent Hessenberg variety, (2) a formula for the number of $X\in \mathfrak u_Λ(\mathbb F_q)$ that satisfy $X^2=0$, which in the special case $Λ=(1^n)$ is different from the Kirillov-Melnikov-Ekhad-Zeilberger formula, and (3) a formula for the number of double cosets $\mathrm U_1\backslash\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb F_q)/\mathrm U_2$ where $\mathrm U_1$ and $\mathrm U_2$ are unipotent subgroups corresponding to two $\mathfrak b_n(\mathbb F_q)$-stable ideals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207