Counting $\mathbb F_q$-points of orbital varieties in ad-nilpotent ideals of type $A_n$
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let $\mathfrak b_n(\mathbb F_q)$ denote the Lie algebra of upper triangular $n\times n$ matrices over the finite field $\mathbb F_q$, and let $\mathfrak u_n(\mathbb F_q)$ be the nilradical of $\mathfrak b_n$. For every $\mathfrak b_n(\mathbb F_q)$-stable ideal $\mathfrak a$ of $\mathfrak u_n(\mathbb F_q)$, and every partition $μ$ of $n$, we prove two formulas for the number of elements of $\mathfrak a$ of Jordan type $μ$: the first one is the Hall scalar product of a modified Hall-Littlewood function indexed by $μ$ and a chromatic quasisymmetric function associated to $\mathfrak a$, and the second one is in terms of an explicit collection of standard tableaux. In the special case that $\mathfrak a$ is the nilradical $\mathfrak u_Λ(\mathbb F_q)$ of the parabolic subalgebra associated to a composition $Λ$ of $n$, our first formula reduces to a result of Karp and Thomas: up to an explicit polynomial factor in $q$, the number of elements in $\mathfrak u_Λ(\mathbb F_q)$ of Jordan type $μ$ is equal to the coefficient of the monomial $\mathsf x^Λ$ in the specialization of the dual Macdonald symmetric function $\mathrm Q_{μ'}(\mathsf x;q^{-1},t)$ at $t=0$. We give three applications: (1) a formula for the number of points of a nilpotent Hessenberg variety, (2) a formula for the number of $X\in \mathfrak u_Λ(\mathbb F_q)$ that satisfy $X^2=0$, which in the special case $Λ=(1^n)$ is different from the Kirillov-Melnikov-Ekhad-Zeilberger formula, and (3) a formula for the number of double cosets $\mathrm U_1\backslash\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb F_q)/\mathrm U_2$ where $\mathrm U_1$ and $\mathrm U_2$ are unipotent subgroups corresponding to two $\mathfrak b_n(\mathbb F_q)$-stable ideals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".