MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416047950 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggaf443

Induced polarization as a tool to characterize permafrost 1. Theory and laboratory experiments

2025· article· en· W4416047950 on OpenAlexaff
A. Revil, J. Richard, Ahmad Ghorbani, Florence Magnin, P A Duvillard, Marco Marcer, Feras Abdulsamad, Thomas Ingeman‐Nielsen, Ludovic Ravanel, Christophe Lambiel, Xavier Bodín, Hong Cai, Xie Hu, P. Vaudelet

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsNunavut Arctic College
FundersNunatsinni Ilisimatusarnermik SiunnersuisoqatigiitCollege of Natural Resources and Sciences, Humboldt State UniversityRégion Auvergne-Rhône-AlpesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNordForskFederación Española de Enfermedades RarasAgence Nationale de la RechercheStrong
KeywordsInduced polarizationConductivityPermafrostPolarization (electrochemistry)Ice coreSea ice growth processesPetrophysicsPorous medium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY In the last decade, the dynamic Stern layer (DSL) model has proven to be a reliable petrophysical model to comprehend induced polarization data at various scales from the representative elementary volume of a porous rock to the interpretation of field data. Preliminary works have demonstrated that such model can be extended to understand the induced polarization properties of ice-bearing rocks and to interpret field-acquired induced polarization data in the context of permafrost. That being said, the direct effect of ice was let aside. We first review the DSL model in presence of ice and discuss the role of ice as an interfacial protonic dirty semiconductor in the complex conductivity spectra with an emphasis on the role of the complex-valued surface conductivity of ice crystals above 1 Hz. We propose a new combined polarization model including indirect and direct ice effects. By direct effects, we mean the effects associated with changes in the liquid water content and salinity of the pore water. By direct effect, we mean that the role of the interfacial properties of the ice surface and liquid water is still present in the pore space of the porous composite. In this case, the electrical current is not expected to cross the ice crystals. Instead, it would polarize the surface of the ice crystals (and therefore the ice crystals) and generate a very high chargeability that can reach one depending on the value of the volumetric content of ice. We apply the DSL model to a new set of complex conductivity spectra obtained in the frequency range 10 mHz–45 kHz using a collection of 25 rock samples including metamorphic and sedimentary rocks in the temperature range +15/+20 °C to −10/−15 °C. We observe that the model explains very well the observed data in the low-frequency range (10 mHz–1 Hz) without any direct contribution of ice. In the high-frequency range (above 1 Hz), we observe a weak contribution possibly associated with the contribution of ice crystals in low-porosity crystalline rocks. We establish under what conditions the direct contribution of ice can be neglected. We also investigate the role of porosity, cation exchange capacity and freezing curve parameters on the complex conductivity spectra of crystalline and non-crystalline rocks during freezing. Laboratory experiments demonstrate that in most field conditions including permafrost conditions, surface conductivity associated with conduction on the surface of clay minerals (and alumino-silicates in general) is expected to dominate the overall conductivity response. This is in sharp contract with many claims found in the literature. Therefore Archie’s law cannot be used as a conductivity equation in this context because of the contribution of surface conductivity. A large experimental and field data set at the Aiguille du Midi (3842 m a.s.l., French Alps) for the resistivity versus temperature data of granitic rocks demonstrates the role of surface conductivity in the overall conductivity of the rock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207