Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic–Induced Changes in Clinical Practicums on the Mental Health of Newly Graduated Nurses: Longitudinal Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted nursing education worldwide, particularly clinical practicums, reducing opportunities for hands-on learning. Newly graduated nurses have reported increased stress, reduced confidence, and a higher risk of burnout. However, few studies have examined the long-term mental health effects of these disruptions. Objective: This study aimed to longitudinally examine how changes in clinical practicums during the COVID-19 pandemic affected the mental health of nurses who graduated in the academic year 2021-2022. Methods: A quantitative longitudinal study was conducted at 3 time points: June 2022, September 2022, and December 2022. This study assessed the nurses' demographic data and the perceived impact on the students of disruptions in domain-specific and integration practicums, practicum formats, and clinical difficulty. Instruments used included the Nursing Job Stressor Scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and adapted items for measuring intention to leave the profession. Participants were categorized into high- and low-impact groups. A 2-way ANOVA was used to examine mental health indicators over time. Results: Participants who perceived a greater impact of practicum disruptions reported substantially higher levels of clinical difficulty and stressors. In the September 2022 survey, those perceiving less impact from the integration practicum reported a stronger intention to continue nursing. In the December 2022 survey, emotional exhaustion, a core component of burnout, was significantly higher in the high-impact group. Conclusions: The perceived quality and extent of clinical practicum experiences significantly influenced the psychological burden and career intentions of newly graduated nurses. Disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may have lasting effects on nurses' mental health. These findings underscore the need for continuous workplace support and targeted mental health interventions for early-career nurses to ensure safe and sustainable nursing practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".