MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy of dose-dense platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with BRCA1/2-associated operable and locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer

2025· article· W4416056343 on OpenAlexaff
E. V. Yangirova, Е. I. Kovalenko, Yaroslav Zhulikov, V. A. Fedko, A.I. Novikov, Т. А. Титова, А. М. Строганова, Т. С. Лисица, Е. В. Артамонова

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical alphabet · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Defence Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerChemotherapyTolerabilityContext (archaeology)RegimenDiseaseStage (stratigraphy)Germline mutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction . BRCA status is of interest as a predictive marker in the context of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The goal of NACT in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is to achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR), which is associated with a significant improvement in event-free and overall survival, and it influences further treatment strategy. The absence of a pronounced pathological response after NACT requires the administration of post-neoadjuvant therapy. Despite numerous studies, the optimal NACT regimen for this group of patients has not yet been determined. Objective . To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of dose-dense platinum-based NACT (4 ddAC followed by 12 PCb) in patients with BRCA1/2- mutated TNBC in terms of pCR rate and Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score, and to identify predictive factors of treatment efficacy. Materials and Methods . This prospective study included 103 patients with gBRCA1/2-associated stage II–III TNBC who received dose-dense platinum-based NACT between January 2018 and December 2024. Among them, 41.7 % had stage III disease and 26.2 % had lymph node involvement at levels N 2–3. Results . The overall pCR rate was 63.1 % (n=65), while disease progression was observed in 7.8 % (n=8). In operable cases, the pCR rate was 63.5 %, and in locally advanced inoperable cases, it was 62.5 %. The most common germline mutation in BRCA1/2 genes was BRCA1 c.5266dup, found in 53.4 % (n=55) of cases. Rare mutations detected by NGS accounted for 30 % (n=31), while common mutations identified by PCR comprised 70 %. Among patients with common mutations, the pCR rate was 70.8 %, compared to 45.2 % in those with rare mutations. The most frequent type of toxicity was hematologic: grade III–IV neutropenia occurred in 33 % (n=34). Dose reduction was performed only in cases of grade II–III adverse events. The only factor significantly associated with higher pCR rate was the presence of common germline BRCA1/2 mutations (p=0.027). Conclusions . Dose-dense NACT including anthracyclines, taxanes, and platinum agents achieves a high rate of pCR in patients with gBRCA1/2- associated stage II–III TNBC, particularly in those with common mutations. The presence of residual tumor after the full course of NACT indicates the need for personalized adjuvant targeted therapy with olaparib.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical alphabetSame topicBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesFrench-language works237,207