MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416059594 · doi:10.55640/ijmsdh-11-11-05

Patient Satisfaction in a Gynecology- Obstetrics Service at Ibn Al Jazzar University Hospital in Tunisia: A Cross- Sectional Study (2023)

2025· article· en· W4416059594 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marwen Nadia, Gurbej Ekram, Nssri Onsi, Ridha Fatnassi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPatient satisfactionLikert scaleCompetence (human resources)University hospitalHealth careCustomer satisfactionService qualityCross-sectional studyService (business)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patient satisfaction is a crucial indicator of healthcare quality, particularly in gynecology-obstetrics services where care involves intimate and sensitive aspects of women's health. Understanding patient perspectives is essential for improving service delivery and healthcare outcomes. Objective: To evaluate patient satisfaction levels in the gynecology-obstetrics service at Ibn Al Jazzar University Hospital in Kairouan, Tunisia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2023 among 276 patients hospitalized in the gynecology-obstetrics service. Data was collected using a validated questionnaire developed by the General Directorate of Public Health Structures (DGSSP) in collaboration with the Observatory on the Performance of Organizations and Health Systems at the University of Montreal (OPOSSUM). The questionnaire assessed overall satisfaction and seven specific domains: accessibility, continuity, comprehensiveness, technical quality, humanization, environment, and conditions of stay. Satisfaction was measured using a 6-point Likert scale (0-5). Results: The overall satisfaction rate was 37%. Domain-specific satisfaction rates varied considerably: accessibility of care (65.6%), continuity of care (41.7%), comprehensiveness of care (16.3%), technical quality of care (52.9%), humanization (37.0%), environment (41.3%), and conditions of stay (5.1%). Physician competence (80.8%) and staff cleanliness and attire (83.7%) received the highest satisfaction ratings, while visiting areas (0%) and visiting hours (5.1%) received the lowest. Conclusion: While overall patient satisfaction in the gynecology-obstetrics service was moderate, significant variations existed across different domains. The findings highlight areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. Implementing targeted interventions, including digital solutions like the GynéSatis mobile application, could enhance patient experience and healthcare quality in this setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.410 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Medical Science and Dental HealthSame topicPatient Satisfaction in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207