Effect of time-restricted feeding on cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease and the role of ApoE polymorphism: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: With the global ageing population accelerating, the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to rise annually. However, the underlying mechanisms of AD remain unclear, and effective treatments are still lacking. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene polymorphism and dietary habits are critical risk factors for AD. Time-restricted feeding (TRF), an intermittent fasting strategy that limits the daily window of food intake while maintaining nutritional balance, has garnered significant attention in recent years for its potential to improve cognitive dysfunction. This study aims to investigate the effect of TRF on cognitive improvement in AD patients within the context of genetic background and to explore the role of ApoE polymorphism in these mechanisms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial will recruit 160 patients with mild to moderate cognitive impairment due to AD from Peking University Shenzhen Hospital. Participants will be stratified based on ApoE genotype into ApoE4 non-carriers and ApoE4 carriers, then randomly assigned to either a TRF intervention group or a normal control group for a 24-month intervention period. The primary outcomes are changes in the Minimum Mental State Examination scale score, Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale score and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes scale score. Key secondary outcomes include the Activities of Daily Living scale score, blood AD biomarkers, lipid levels, ketone body levels and cerebral glutamate levels. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (Ethics No. 2024-151). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before the commencement of the trial. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400092653.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".