MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416061570 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099591

Effect of time-restricted feeding on cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease and the role of ApoE polymorphism: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4416061570 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xin Zhang, Xuhui Chen, Weiwei Yu, Mengzhen Jia, Li Zhu, Zhigang Liu, Jun Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDietary Effects on Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPeking University
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialDiseaseProtocol (science)CognitionApolipoprotein EClinical trialEpidemiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: With the global ageing population accelerating, the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to rise annually. However, the underlying mechanisms of AD remain unclear, and effective treatments are still lacking. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene polymorphism and dietary habits are critical risk factors for AD. Time-restricted feeding (TRF), an intermittent fasting strategy that limits the daily window of food intake while maintaining nutritional balance, has garnered significant attention in recent years for its potential to improve cognitive dysfunction. This study aims to investigate the effect of TRF on cognitive improvement in AD patients within the context of genetic background and to explore the role of ApoE polymorphism in these mechanisms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial will recruit 160 patients with mild to moderate cognitive impairment due to AD from Peking University Shenzhen Hospital. Participants will be stratified based on ApoE genotype into ApoE4 non-carriers and ApoE4 carriers, then randomly assigned to either a TRF intervention group or a normal control group for a 24-month intervention period. The primary outcomes are changes in the Minimum Mental State Examination scale score, Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale score and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes scale score. Key secondary outcomes include the Activities of Daily Living scale score, blood AD biomarkers, lipid levels, ketone body levels and cerebral glutamate levels. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (Ethics No. 2024-151). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before the commencement of the trial. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400092653.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicDietary Effects on HealthFrench-language works237,207