Bibliographic record
Abstract
The far north-eastern corner of New South Wales (NSW), a region commonly referred to as either the Far North Coast or Northern Rivers, has a particular status within NSW, Australian and international social imaginaries on account of its rich environmental assets and the lifestyle and cultural characteristics commonly associated with it (typified by the lyrics to Kelly’s song that preface this article). The first named author’s extended residence in the region in 2000-2021 and participation in community groups and public forums indicated that these senses of place were shared, to varying extents, by its residents but are also juxtaposed with and/or opposed by others who have different senses of locale and region. This is unsurprising, as such perceptions are highly contingent on socio-cultural, political and spiritual inclinations, some of which can be more easily aligned with dominant regional identity projections than others. The concept of regionality is, itself, a complex and contingent one and this article explores these tensions and divergencies with regard to an area that has strong place mythologies and shifting demographics that are modifying these.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".