MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416065388 · doi:10.3390/ijms262210877

Perturbations of Zinc Homeostasis and Onset of Neuropsychiatric Disorders

2025· article· en· W4416065388 on OpenAlexaff
Gavino Faa, Claudia Meloni, Mara Lastretti, Martina Pinna, Mirko Manchia, Pasquale Paribello

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Major depressive disorderAutism spectrum disorderBiomarkerDiseaseAutismBipolar disorderClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zinc (Zn2+) is a trace element essential for its catalytic, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory roles extending to synaptic signalling in the central nervous system. In this narrative review, we aim to offer the reader evidence linking perturbations of the Zn2+ homeostasis, including deficiency, excess, or transportation anomalies, to neuropsychiatric conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia (SCZ), major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar disorder (BD). A targeted, unsystematic PubMed search followed by an extensive pearl-growing strategy was applied to further augment study selection based on the extensive expertise of study authors. Overall, most of the evidence currently available suggests a modest benefit for a Zn2+ supplement of around 25–30 mg/day as an augmentation to MDD treatment, with potential benefits of smaller magnitude in paediatric ADHD. Evidence for perturbations of Zn2+ as a biomarker of risk for these neuropsychiatric disorders remains unconvincing. The role of Zn2+ supplements in the treatment of the selected conditions remains largely unknown due to the lack of specific, randomised controlled trials conducted to explore their efficacy. The long-term safety, optimal doses for specific applications, and the exploration of possible biomarkers to stratify patient selection to identify the optimal candidate for Zn2+ supplements remain unanswered questions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207