MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416067216 · doi:10.1242/dev.204779

Neanderthal-derived variants increase <i>SOX9</i> enhancer activity in craniofacial progenitors that shape jaw development

2025· article· en· W4416067216 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kirsty Uttley, Hannah J. Jüllig, Carlo DeAngelis, Julia M. T. Auer, Ewa Ozga, Hemant Bengani, Hannah K. Long

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicdental development and anomalies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersErasmus+Medical Research CouncilUniversity of EdinburghInstitute of GeneticsWellcome Trust
KeywordsCraniofacialEnhancerZebrafishProgenitor cellSOX9

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human facial appearance is a highly variable morphological trait, with both rare and common genetic variants shaping craniofacial morphology between individuals and in disease. Deletions encompassing an enhancer cluster 1.45 megabases upstream of SOX9 (EC1.45) cause Pierre Robin sequence, a craniofacial disorder characterised by underdevelopment of the lower jaw and associated with cleft palate. We hypothesised therefore that single nucleotide variants within EC1.45 may cause more subtle alterations in facial form. Leveraging recent human evolution, and the distinct jaw morphology of Neanderthals, we investigated the impact of three Neanderthal-derived variants on EC1.45 function. Using zebrafish dual enhancer-reporters, we observed higher activity of Neanderthal EC1.45 in neural crest-derived progenitor cells during a specific developmental window. These EC1.45-active cells reside proximal to and are transcriptionally related to precartilaginous condensations that contribute to craniofacial skeletal development. Mimicking the observed increase in enhancer activity, we overexpressed human SOX9 in EC1.45-active cells and detected an expanded volume of developing cartilaginous precursors. Our work implicates Neanderthal-derived variants in increasing regulatory activity for a disease-associated enhancer, with the potential to impact craniofacial morphology across recent hominin evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmentSame topicdental development and anomaliesFrench-language works237,207