MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416067753 · doi:10.1177/08977151251393718

Parental and Family Functioning as Predictors of Longitudinal Trajectories of Postconcussive Symptoms Following Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Advancing Concussion Assessment in Pediatrics Study

2025· article· en· W4416067753 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Leah Chadwick, Sheri Madigan, Brandy L. Callahan, Miriam H. Beauchamp, William Craig, Quynh Doan, Stephen B. Freedman, Jocelyn Gravel, Roger Zemek, Keith Owen Yeates

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurotrauma · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaStollery Children's HospitalHotchkiss Brain InstituteCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsConcussionTraumatic brain injuryCognitionInjury preventionPoison controlHuman factors and ergonomicsOccupational safety and healthSuicide prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The family environment plays an important role in children’s recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, parental and family factors have not been examined in-depth in pediatric mild TBI (mTBI). Existing research on postconcussive symptoms (PCS) typically employs conventional statistical analyses that assume that children with mTBI are a homogenous group. However, children may display distinct trajectories of PCS across time after mTBI. Group-based multitrajectory modeling can identify latent clusters of individuals following similar trajectories across multiple indicators of an outcome. This study sought to: (1) identify trajectories of PCS after mTBI in children, and (2) examine their association with parental and family functioning. Participants were 506 children and adolescents aged 8- to 16-years-old who were recruited during emergency department (ED) visits within 48 h of injury at five Pediatric Emergency Research Canada hospitals. Injury information was collected in the ED, and parental and family functioning was measured at approximately 7 days postinjury. Child and parent PCS ratings were obtained weekly to 3 months and biweekly to 6 months postinjury using the Health and Behavior Inventory. Parental and family functioning were assessed using validated measures of family functioning, parental adjustment, perceived social support from parents, and parental responses to children’s symptom complaints. Group-based multitrajectory modeling was used to classify individual children into distinct trajectories of child- and parent-reported cognitive and somatic PCS over time and to examine predictors of those trajectories. Six distinct trajectories were identified: “low acute/resolved PCS” ( n = 98), “low acute/declining PCS” ( n = 64), “moderate acute/elevated cognitive PCS” ( n = 106), “moderate acute/declining PCS” ( n = 118), “high acute/declining PCS” ( n = 88), and “high acute/persisting PCS” ( n = 32). Parental adjustment, protectiveness, and social support were independent predictors of trajectory membership after adjusting for demographic and injury characteristics. The identification of different symptom trajectories and specific aspects of parental and family functioning as predictors of these trajectories provides guidance for developing family-based treatments and targeting treatments to children at risk for poor recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurotraumaSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207