MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S1054 The Role of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in the Management of Zenker’s Diverticulum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4416070829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zain Ul Abideen, Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Khadija Mohib, Abu-Bakr Ahmed, Sania Aimen, Noor Ul Huda Ramzan, Mian Uman Anwer, Prasun K. Jalal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyotomyDysphagiaMeta-analysisFunnel plotAdverse effectConfidence intervalCricopharyngeal myotomyMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) causing dysphagia in older adults is a false pulsion diverticulum. Zenker’s peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM), a novel approach utilizing the submucosal layer to fully visualize and cut the septum, offers a minimally invasive alternative to conventional endoscopic septotomy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the POEM technique in ZD management. Methods: The electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to January 2025. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The pooled analysis was conducted under the random effects model in R version 4.2.3 and employed the “metaprop” package. The primary and secondary outcomes of interest were clinical success, technical success, symptom recurrence, and adverse events. The quality of studies was judged by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Publication bias was assessed through visual inspection of the funnel plots. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate heterogeneity. Results: Twenty studies pooling a total of 713 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled clinical success rate was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89-96%; I2 = 9.5%). The technical success rate was 99% (95% CI 97-100%; I2 = 0%). Regarding the recurrence of the symptoms, the pooled rate was 6% (95% CI 4-11%; I2 = 1.3%) whereas the pooled rate of adverse events was 7% (95% CI 5-11%; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy demonstrates high clinical and technical success rates with low rates of symptom recurrence and adverse events establishing it as a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for managing Zenker’s diverticulum. These findings highlight Z-POEM's potential as a superior alternative to conventional endoscopic techniques in older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.038
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207