MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416074550 · doi:10.1056/evidoa2500268

Zalunfiban at First Medical Contact for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

2025· article· en· W4416074550 on OpenAlex
Arnoud W.J. van ’t Hof, C. Michael Gibson, S. A. O. F. Rikken, James L. Januzzi, C. B. Granger, A van Beurden, Saman Rasoul, Lex A. W. Ruiters, Jindra Vainer, Ashley Verburg, Fatih Arslan, J. Wouter Jukema, Marcel E. Durieux, Jawed Polad, Ben J L Van den Branden, Michael Magro, Wouter Remkes, Janne Beelen, Renicus S. Hermanides, Rudolf T Tolsma, M. Gosselink, Dragoş Vinereanu, Valentin Chioncel, Tim P. van de Hoef, René Boomars, Karin Arkenbout, Gert K. van Houwelingen, G. Hengstman, Henri van de Wetering, Ron Pisters, Petr Kala, Béla Merkely, Patrick Ecollan, Frédéric Lapostolle, Robert P. Giugliano, Robert C. Welsh, Miles Levy, Alexandra Arias‐Mendoza, N. Baron, Daniel Cociorva, Janet Wittes, Ellis F. Unger, Barry S. Coller, J. M. ten Berg, G Montalescot

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNEJM Evidence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian VIGOUR CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyocardial infarctionElectrocardiography in myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarction complicationsInfarctionPercutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Zalunfiban is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (integrin αIIbβ3) inhibitor designed for subcutaneous administration on first medical contact with patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: An international, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomly assigned patients with STEMI in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection of zalunfiban (0.11 mg/kg or 0.13 mg/kg) or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was a hierarchical proportional odds model ranking seven end points from worst to best: all-cause death, stroke, recurrent myocardial infarction, acute stent thrombosis, new-onset or rehospitalization for heart failure, larger infarct size, or no end point through 30 days. The primary safety end point was the occurrence of severe or life-threatening bleeding as per the global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO) criteria. RESULTS: The trial randomly assigned 2467 patients (853 to zalunfiban 0.11 mg/kg, 818 to zalunfiban 0.13 mg/kg, and 796 to placebo). The primary efficacy end point was significantly improved by zalunfiban (adjusted odds ratio 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.98; P=0.028). GUSTO severe bleeding was similar between those who received zalunfiban versus placebo (1.2% vs. 0.8%; P=0.40), but GUSTO mild to moderate bleeding was increased (6.4% vs. 2.5%; P<0.001). Angiography showed faster coronary blood flow with zalunfiban versus placebo (corrected frame count of the infarct-related artery 109 [interquartile range 35 to 176] vs. 176 [interquartile range 40 to 176]; P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI, zalunfiban administered at first medical contact significantly improved preintervention infarct-related patency and reduced the likelihood of a worse 30-day multicomponent hierarchical clinical end point. Zalunfiban was not associated with increased severe or life-threatening bleeding but was associated with increased mild to moderate bleeding. (Funded by CeleCor Therapeutics; CELEBRATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04825743.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it