Gold mobility in Archean metasedimentary belts: Implications for orogenic gold deposits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The southern Superior Province (Canada) comprises large metasedimentary belts, such as the Pontiac and Quetico subprovinces, adjacent to Au-endowed greenstone belts. The Pontiac sedimentary rocks have been proposed as a source of Au for the highly endowed southern Abitibi greenstone belt. However, a comparison with sedimentary rocks adjacent to poorly endowed greenstone belts is lacking. Here we examine a suite of metasedimentary and minor volcanic rocks collected from three transects in the Pontiac and Quetico metasedimentary belts adjacent to greenstone belts with variable Au endowments. We combine in situ Au data of sulfides in metasedimentary rocks with whole-rock ultra-low-detection Au data. Gold concentrations decrease across metamorphic isograds in the well- and moderately endowed transects, while limited Au mobility is observed in the poorly endowed transect. The release of Au from metasedimentary rocks is linked to the pyrite-pyrrhotite transition. This reaction is incomplete in the poorly endowed transect, explaining the limited Au mobility observed. Our data reveal a spatial correlation between Au mobility in metasedimentary belts and Au endowment in the adjacent greenstone belts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".