MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416085285 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1114

IMG-35. Targeted blood-nerve-barrier opening for the delivery of MEK inhibitor selumetinib in peripheral nerve sheath tumours using focused ultrasound

2025· article· en· W4416085285 on OpenAlexaff
Jenny Cheung, Ying Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSciatic nerveSelumetinibNeurofibromatosisAdverse effectMalignant peripheral nerve sheath tumorNerve sheath neoplasmPeripheralUltrasound

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1) is a genetic disorder affecting 1 in 2500 births and is characterized by the development of multiple peripheral nerve sheath tumours (PNSTs). Treatment involves surgical resection and radiation therapy however both are invasive and associated with morbidity, pain, neurological complications, and long-term risks associated with ionizing radiation. Clinical trials in NF1 patients have identified selumetinib as a promising chemotherapeutic as it can reduce tumour size and inhibit tumour progression. However, only 68% of patients showed a partial response with 10% discontinuing treatment due to toxicities; adverse events occur in 50% of patients. Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a non-invasive, non-ionizing technique that uses ultrasonic waves to manipulate deep tissue without affecting overlying or surrounding structures. Through stable cavitation of intravenous microbubbles, FUS can disrupt the blood-nerve-barrier (BNB) and could offer a novel strategy in targeted selumetinib delivery to PNSTs, enabling lower systemic doses and reducing off-target toxicities. We first wanted to confirm the feasibility of non-invasive BNB disruption in the sciatic nerve. In an acute experiment with 6 C57BL/6J mice, the right sciatic nerve was sonicated at 0.3 MPa. Evan’s blue dye penetration suggested successful BNB disruption. Half the animals were sacrificed immediately and both the right and left sciatic nerves were collected. The other half were kept for acute clinical assessments at 24 hours post FUS. No change in hind limb function was observed with a slight reduction in avoiding response, however further studies are required to elucidate these changes. The sciatic nerves were collected after. H&E stains were performed on the nerves to assess for tissue damage. Based on images taken, there was no evidence of tissue damage between the sonicated and un-sonicated nerves. This suggests this technique may be feasible. Future work will be to perform FUS in a tumour model with and without drug.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207