Acetylation of H3K115 is associated with fragile nucleosomes at CpG island promoters and active regulatory sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acetylation of lysine residues in the tail domain of histone H3 is well characterised, but lysine residues in the histone globular domain are also acetylated. Histone modifications in the globular domain have regulatory potential because of their impact on nucleosome stability but remain poorly characterised. In this study, we report the genome-wide distribution of acetylated H3 lysine 115 (H3K115ac), a residue on the lateral surface at the nucleosome dyad, using chromatin immunoprecipitation. In mouse embryonic stem cells, we find that detectable H3K115ac is enriched at the transcription start site of active CpG island promoters, but also at polycomb-repressed promoters prior to their subsequent activation during differentiation. By contrast, at enhancers, H3K115ac enrichment is dynamic, changing in line with gene activation and chromatin accessibility during differentiation. Most strikingly, we show that H3K115ac is detected as enriched on 'fragile' nucleosomes within nucleosome-depleted regions at promoters and active enhancers, where it coincides with transcription factor binding, and at CTCF-bound sites. These unique features suggest that H3K115ac correlates with, and could contribute to, nucleosome destabilisation and that it might be a valuable marker for identifying functionally important regulatory elements in mammalian genomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".