MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416096216 · doi:10.1111/hdi.70030

Constant Fluid Removal Associates With Greater Risk of Elevated High‐Sensitivity Troponin I Than Downward Sloping Profile Among Maintenance Dialysis Patients With High Ultrafiltration

2025· article· en· W4416096216 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Namrata Rao, Abhilash Chandra, Manish Raj Kulshreshta, Sai Saran, Prabhakar Mishra

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrafiltration (renal)HemodialysisDialysisTroponinClinical trialTroponin I

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: High ultrafiltration rate is a common clinical problem in those undergoing maintenance dialysis and is associated with myocardial injury and increased mortality. The safety of the downward sloping profile of ultrafiltration in those with high ultrafiltration rates is currently unknown. The aim of the present study is to compare mean arterial pressure trends and dialysis-associated high-sensitivity Troponin I changes among patients with high ultrafiltration rates undergoing constant and profiled ultrafiltration. METHODS: The enrolled study participants were patients on maintenance dialysis thrice weekly with ultrafiltration rates > 13 mL/kg/h and without known cardiac disease. During the study month, they received six sessions with constant ultrafiltration and six sessions with downward sloping profiled ultrafiltration. Pre-to-post HD hs TnI change, blood pressures, and intradialytic hypotension episodes were measured during all 12 sessions. FINDINGS: A total of 42 study participants with 504 dialysis sessions were analyzed. The mean age of study participants was 41.3 (±12.1) years, two-thirds were male, and up to 17% had diabetes mellitus. The mean ultrafiltration volume was 17.4 (±3.2) mL/kg/h. Mean arterial pressures and intradialytic hypotension did not differ significantly between constant and profiled sessions, except for trends toward higher pressures at the post-HD timepoint in profiled UF (p = 0.08). Upon comparing Δ Post-Pre-HD hs Tn I of constant versus profiled ultrafiltration, constant sessions showed a median rise of troponin, ranging from 8 to 21 ng/mL from pre- to post-HD, and profiled sessions showed a median fall, ranging from 11 to 21 ng/mL from pre- to post-HD during profiled UF sessions (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that constant UF type was associated with 27 times greater odds of developing a 10% rise in high-sensitivity troponin. CONCLUSION: In maintenance dialysis patients with high ultrafiltration, constant fluid removal is associated with a rise in hs Tn I, and a downward sloping profile may be safer than constant fluid removal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI): CTRI/2023/02/049618.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207