MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416098197 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v17n11p60

A New Theory of International Trade: Capital Deepening and Market Segment Determines the Pattern of International Trade

2025· article· W4416098197 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chao Chiung Ting

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonopolistic competitionProductivityCapital (architecture)Competition (biology)Total factor productivityOligopolyProduction (economics)Developing countryFree tradeContradiction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through growth and investment, two countries will have the same capital-labor ratio and productivity which leads to the same factor prices in the long run if two countries have the same production function with constant return to scale. Consequently, H-O model predicts no trade in the long run as Stolper and Samuelson (1941) recognized a contradiction in the H-O model that the full equalization of factor prices, which eliminates the cost difference between two countries, will lead to no trade. Since a theory is false if we derive contradictory conclusions (e.g., trade and no trade) from assumptions (i.e., premises in the sense of logic), we should completely get rid of the H-O model even H-O model explains some trade patterns (e.g., a natural resources abundant country exports natural resource) because we can derive true conclusions from a false model. Capital deepening suggests that productivity rises when the capital-labor ratio increases. Thus, productivity determines the trade pattern. For example, capital-abundant countries can export labor-intensive goods if the capital-labor ratio (productivity) of a labor-intensive industry in a capital-abundant country is higher than its counterpart in labor-abundant countries and vice versa, e.g., British exported cotton textiles to India even British was a relatively capital-abundant country to India and cotton textiles were a labor-intensive good in the nineteenth century British. Besides, oligopoly explains intra-industry trade in the global market because the strategy of competition between firms would segment the market by quality and price hierarchies rather than monopolistic competition. Finally, Ting (2020) implied that wage rates in capital-intensive industries and capital-abundant countries (e.g., manufacturing) are higher than labor-intensive industries and labor-abundant countries (e.g., agriculture) so factor prices differentiate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.010
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance→Same topicGlobal trade and economics→French-language works237,207→