MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416099196 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1633287

A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of Baduanjin exercise on balance impairment in patients with cervical dystonia

2025· article· en· W4416099196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jixuan Wang, Qiao Huang, Huanan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiofield Effects and Biophysics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialBalance (ability)Cervical dystoniaProtocol (science)Physical activityClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients with cervical dystonia (CD) commonly exhibit varying degrees of impaired balance, abnormal gait, and increased fear of falling. However, Botulinum toxin-the standard of care-does not substantially improve balance or gait. Baduanjin, a traditional Chinese exercise, improves balance in several neurological disorders, yet its effects in CD remain unknown. This protocol describes a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of Baduanjin exercise on balance impairment in patients with CD. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolls CD patients with impaired balance. Eligible participants are randomly allocated (1:1) to either a Baduanjin intervention group or a control group without Baduanjin. The Baduanjin group undergoes a 20-week training program. The primary outcome is balance function, evaluated through the Berg Balance Scale. Secondary outcomes include standing static balance ability assessed by the Zebris Stance Analysis FDM System, fall risk conducted using the Timed Up & Go test, gait-related data assessed by the Zebris Gait Analysis FDM System, the severity of CD assessed by the Toronto Western Spasm Rating Scale, and the anxiety status of patients assessed by the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. The entirety of the data are collected at the baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 20 weeks. A two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) or generalized estimating equations are used to assess the effectiveness of Baduanjin. Discussion: This protocol is the first randomized controlled design to evaluate Baduanjin for balance and gait in cervical dystonia, combining objective instrumented outcomes with validated clinical scales and a pragmatic supervised-to-home regimen, thereby providing decision-relevant evidence. Clinical trial registration: http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/zh-CN/Home/ProjectView?pid=fce76993-0978-484e-ba50-c097b35805c7, ITMCTR2024000240.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.036
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0360.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1130.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicBiofield Effects and BiophysicsFrench-language works237,207