MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416100044 · doi:10.1155/criu/4441127

Incidental Renal Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis Within Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

2025· article· en· W4416100044 on OpenAlexaff
Charles-Antoine Garneau, Cathie Ouellet, Sophie Morin, Isabelle Harvey, Bruno Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Urology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistiocytic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLangerhans cell histiocytosisClear cell renal cell carcinomaPathologicalClear cellImmunohistochemistryRenal cell carcinomaClear-cell adenocarcinomaKidneyHistiocytosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a disease characterized by the excessive proliferation and abnormal differentiation of immune cells, including monocytes, T cells, and dendritic cells. The most affected organs are the bones, skin, lungs, liver, and spleen, while renal involvement is rare. LCH primarily affects children and is seldom diagnosed in adults. In this case report, we describe a 64‐year‐old man patient with no prior urological history nor history of LCH and presenting with both localized renal LCH and clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC). Renal cancer was first discovered fortuitously on an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan while the patient presented symptoms of a complicated urinary tract infection. Following radical nephrectomy, LCH foci was detected as incidental histological finding within the ccRCC pathological analysis. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed the positivity of S‐100 and CD1a markers and PCR analysis identified the BRAF V600E mutation. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of ccRCC associated with LCH was established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Reports in UrologySame topicHistiocytic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207