MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416101080 · doi:10.1002/ejhf.70091

Clinical Profiles and Prognostic Impact of Residual Intravascular and Tissue Congestion in Acute Heart Failure

2025· article· en· W4416101080 on OpenAlexaff
Daan C H Ceelen, Jozine M. ter Maaten, Geert H.D. Voordes, Gad Cotter, Beth A. Davison, Gerasimos Filippatos, Peter S. Pang, Claudio Gimpelewicz, John G.F. Cleland, G. Michael Felker, Barry Greenberg, Michael M. Givertz, Christopher M. O'Conner, John R. Teerlink, Marco Metra, Adriaan A. Voors

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Heart Failure · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
FundersNational Institutes of HealthServierKowa CompanyEuropean CommissionIdorsia PharmaceuticalsCytokineticsBritish Heart FoundationImpulse DynamicsIncyteBayerBristol-Myers SquibbAstraZenecaNovo Nordisk
KeywordsHeart failureDiureticIntravascular volume statusResidualMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Residual congestion (RC) is common at discharge after acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and is associated with early mortality and rehospitalization. The prognostic value of distinct RC phenotypes (i.e. intravascular and tissue congestion) remains unclear. This analysis investigated RC phenotypes and their outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with congestion at admission from two large ADHF trials, PROTECT (rolofylline; index) and RELAX-AHF-2 (serelaxin; replication), were classified based on clinical signs at day 7/discharge as intravascular (jugular venous pressure) or tissue (pulmonary rales/peripheral oedema) congestion, each alone, combined or neither. Cox regression assessed 180-day mortality after adjusting for risk factors. Overall, 1557 patients with predominantly combined (i.e. tissue and intravascular) congestion at admission were included, with a median age of 72 years. By day 7 or discharge, 580 (37%) patients had RC. In these patients, intravascular congestion (n = 260; 45%) was most common, followed by combined (n = 185; 32%) and tissue (n = 135; 23%) congestion. During hospitalization, patients with solely intravascular RC had greater diuretic responses, shorter hospital stays and received lower doses of intravenous loop diuretics than those with tissue or combined congestion (all p < 0.05). Residual intravascular and tissue congestion were independently associated with increased 180-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.49, and HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.25-3.41, respectively) compared to decongested patients. In the RELAX-AHF-2 substudy (n = 476), similar findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intravascular RC had better diuretic responses and shorter hospital stays than those with tissue/combined RC, but worse outcomes than decongested patients. This study highlights the importance of RC assessment to identify at-risk patients. Future studies should evaluate phenotype-guided treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Heart FailureSame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207