MYCOLOGICAL HERBARIUM OF THE KOMAROV BOTANICAL INSTITUTE RAS. XI. LICHENICOLOUS FUNG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mycological herbarium within the V.L. Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia (LE F) contains 6307 specimens of lichenicolous fungi representing 667 species in 197 genera, which covers about a quarter of the known species and about half of the genera in this group of fungi. This assemblage it on a par with the world’s largest collections of lichenicolous fungi such as the herbaria at the Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University (UPS), Meise Botanic Garden (BR), and Botanische Staatssammlung München (M). The LE F herbarium contains holotypes, isotypes, epitype and neotype of 131 species and 5 varieties of lichenicolous fungi, which represents about 5% of their known species diversity. The majority (73%) of specimens were collected from the mid-1990s onwards, when a focused study of this group of fungi was initiated in the Russian Federation. However, there are also some historical specimens collected in the 19th century. One hundred and eighty--eight (3%) specimens entered the herbarium as part of the exsiccate. The largest number of specimens (71%) were collected in the Russian Federation, but there are also specimens from 33 other countries, the most represented being Mongolia, United States of America, Canada, and Norway. The main principals of the 326 specimen collectors are M.P. Zhurbenko (52% of specimens), I.I. Makarova (5%), N.V. Matveeva (3%), D.E. Himelbrant (3%), and V.P. Savicz (2%). Sufficient representation of the sample of lichenicolous fungi specimens in the LE F herbarium has made it possible to make major generalizations, such as checklists of lichenicolous fungi of Russia and Mongolia and an annotated catalogue of lichenicolous fungi of the Russian Meta-arctic. The information on these specimens is available on the Internet and is an important source of information for the preparation of a worldwide “Flora of Lichenicolous Fungi”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.102 | 0.098 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".