MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416122581 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.07.25339777

Sex specific trajectories of verbal memory decline suggest masking of Alzheimer’s Disease symptoms in females

2025· preprint· W4416122581 on OpenAlexaff
Sasha Novozhilova, Vladimir Fonov, Neda Shafiee, Denise Klein, Sylvia Villeneuve, D. Louis Collins

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecallVerbal learningCognitionVerbal memoryLongitudinal studyCalifornia Verbal Learning TestCohortMasking (illustration)DiseaseCognitive impairment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structured Abstract INTRODUCTION Verbal memory tests like the Rey’s Auditory Learning Test (RAVLT) are widely used in Alzheimer’s disease assessments without consideration of females’ well-known advantages in verbal memory. This study explores if this form of cognitive reserve masks symptoms and delays diagnosis in females. METHODS We employed a retrospective longitudinal cohort design (ADNI, PREVENT-AD) to model Immediate Recall subcomponents on the RAVLT over time in amyloid negative (Aβ-) cognitively normal participants versus Aβ+ participants that progressed to AD dementia. RESULTS Our Bayesian model successfully identified the inflection point where cognition deviates from normal onto the AD dementia trajectory. The timing of decline onset differed significantly across sexes, with Aβ+ females maintaining normal cognition longer than Aβ+ males. Among individuals with AD dementia, females experienced a steeper annual decline than males. DISCUSSION Delayed onset of decline suggests that females preserve cognition despite neuropathology accumulation. This masked period represents a window for earlier detection and timely intervention before irreversible neurodegeneration. Research in Context Systematic review: The authors reviewed the literature from PubMed and Elsevier to identify verbal memory as a core feature in the Alzheimer’s Disease discourse. Our critical appraisal was complemented with meetings with expert neuropsychologists and neuroinformaticians. Interpretations: We find that females have superior performance on Rey’s Auditory Learning Test (RAVLT) Immediate Recall, females maintain performance for longer than males before being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s Disease, and once diagnosed, they decline faster than males. These findings underscore the importance of conducting Alzheimer’s Disease assessments with considerations for sex differences. Future directions: We aim to continue the investigation of cognitive reserve in females in the context of the Amyloid, Tau and Neurodegeneration (ANT) framework. Considering the early stage of disease is of interest given that our results show the appearance of cognitive symptoms many years before official dementia diagnosis. Highlights - In cognitively healthy amyloid negative participants, females outperform males on the Rey’s Auditory Learning Test (RAVLT). - In the amyloid positive participants, females maintain normal verbal memory for 2.7 years longer than males. - After divergence from cognitive normality, females experience approximately a 25-50% steeper cognitive decline compared to males. - Our findings call attention to the female verbal memory advantage as an influential form of cognitive reserve that requires diagnostic consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→