MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416123338 · doi:10.1186/s40066-025-00554-z

The impact of sustainable organic agriculture on food security in sub-Saharan Africa: a mixed methods systematic review with meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4416123338 on OpenAlex
André M. N. Renzaho, Rashid Abdulai, Kh. Shafiur Rahaman, Sanjay Kumar Das, Ramadhani Noor, Bukola Salami, Stanley Chitekwe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriculture & Food Security · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
FundersUNICEF
KeywordsFood securityPer capitaAgricultureSustainable agricultureRevenueCalorieDietary diversitySystematic reviewFood group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to undertake a comprehensive mixed methods systematic review to examine the effectiveness of sustainable organic agriculture (SOA) in improving food security in sub-Saharan Africa. Medline (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS/ Elsevier were searched from January 2000 to July 2024. The impact of three types of SOA was evaluated: sustainable intensification practices (SIPs), climate-smart agriculture (CSA), and nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA). Weighted pooled mean differences (PMD) and 95% CIs were used to assess between-group differences using random effect models (I 2 > 50%). Seventy-eight studies were eligible for inclusion. Compared to non-adopters of SOA, adopters experienced a 16.33% lower prevalence of food insecurity (95%CI: − 21.62, − 11.03, p < 0.001) and a 5.24% lower prevalence of coping strategies (95%CI − 9.06, − 1.41; p < 0.01). They recorded an additional 1019 kg/ha in cereal yield equivalent (95%CI: 397.05, 1641.39, p < 0.01), USD 155.60 in per capita farm food yield revenue (95%CI 89.40, 221.81; p < 0.001), and USD 57 in per capita income (95%CI 17, 97; p < 0.01). They also reported USD 14 higher per capita food consumption expenditure per year (95%CI 6, 21; p < 0.001), a 10.4% increase in food and nutrient intake (95%CI 6.5, 14.3, p < 0.001), 687.4 kcal higher calorie intake (95%CI 302.0, 1072.9; p < 0.001), a 0.90-point increase in dietary diversity score (95%CI 0.62, 1.19, p < 0.001), a 0.14 standard deviation improvement in children’s height-for-age z-scores (95%CI 0.053, 0.225, p < 0.001), and a 0.28-point increase in women’s BMI (95%CI 0.272, 0.292; p < 0.001). Overall, results were significantly consistent across all sub-Saharan regions as well as SIPs and CSA. SOA practices significantly improve food security among smallholder farming households.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it