Diffusion-Based Parameters for Stock Clustering: Sector Separation and Out-of-Sample Evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clustering techniques are widely applied to equity markets to uncover sectoral structures and regime shifts, yet most studies rely solely on empirical returns. This paper introduces a novel perspective by using diffusion-based parameters from the Black–Scholes model, namely monthly drift and diffusion, as clustering features. Using SET100 stocks in 2020, we applied k-means clustering and evaluated performances with silhouette scores, the Adjusted Rand Index, Wilcoxon tests, and an out-of-sample portfolio exercise. The results showed that diffusion-based features achieved higher silhouette scores in turbulent months, where they revealed sectoral divergence that log-returns failed to capture. The partition for November 2020 provided clearer sector separation and smaller portfolio losses, demonstrating predictive value beyond in-sample fit. Practically, the findings indicate that diffusion-based parameters can signal early signs of market stress, guide sector rotation decisions during volatile regimes, and enhance portfolio risk management by isolating persistent volatility structures across sectors. Theoretically, this model-based framework bridges equity clustering with stochastic diffusion representations used in derivatives valuation, offering a unified and interpretable tool for data-driven market monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".