MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416132037 · doi:10.1155/tbed/9454210

Development and Application of a TaqMan‐Based One‐Step Quadruplex Reverse Transcription Real‐Time PCR (RT‐qPCR) for Differential Detection of Four Porcine Diarrhea Viruses

2025· article· en· W4416132037 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Wang, Zhaokun Chen, Jizong Li, Baochao Fan, Xuehan Zhang, Min Sun, Yongxiang Zhao, Hongqi Shang, Bin Li, Junming Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueTransboundary and Emerging Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Virus Infections Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaJiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationJiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund
KeywordsReverse transcriptaseVirusDiarrheaReverse transcription polymerase chain reactionRotavirusPorcine epidemic diarrhea virusViral replication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), and porcine rotavirus group A (PoRVA) are recognized as major enteric viral pathogens responsible for porcine viral diarrhea. These viruses exhibit similar clinical manifestations, including vomiting, diarrhea, and dehydration, which complicate differential diagnosis. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic method to differentiate these pathogens. In this study, we developed a TaqMan‐based one‐step quadruplex reverse transcription real‐time PCR (RT‐qPCR) assay for the simultaneous and differential detection of these four porcine diarrhea viruses. The standard curves demonstrated correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) exceeded 0.990 across a dynamic range of 10 7.5 – 10 2.5 TCID 50 /mL, and amplification efficiency ranged from 90% to 110%. The limit of detection (LOD) were 10 1.5 TCID 50 /mL. Specificity analysis showed no cross‐reactivity with other related pathogens. The assay exhibited good repeatability, with coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 0.15% to 1.41% for intra‐assay and 0.09% to 2.09% for inter‐assay, respectively. Finally, this method was evaluated for its practicality in the field using 348 clinical fecal samples. The positive rates of PEDV, TGEV, PDCoV, and PoRVA were 43.68%, 0.57%, 26.44%, and 33.91%, respectively. Furthermore, the coinfection rates of PEDV/PDCoV, PEDV/PoRVA, PDCoV/PoRVA, and PEDV/PDCoV/PoRVA were14.37%, 13.51%, 2.01%, and 5.75%, respectively. Compared to singleplex RT‐qPCR assays, the quadruplex method demonstrated agreement rates ranging from 99.41% to 100% in detecting these four viral pathogens. In conclusion, the developed quadruplex RT‐qPCR assay offers a reliable, sensitive, and accurate tool for the identification of four causative agents of porcine viral diarrhea, making it suitable for clinical diagnosis, disease surveillance, and epidemiological studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransboundary and Emerging DiseasesSame topicAnimal Virus Infections StudiesFrench-language works237,207