Novel Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay Is Sensitive for Detection of Macrolide Resistance Genes Relevant to Bovine Respiratory Disease Management in Feedlot Calves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Macrolides are crucial for the management and treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD). However, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens the efficacy of these and other antimicrobials. We developed real-time recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assays targeting three clinically relevant macrolide antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs)—msrE-mphE and erm42—in ≤30 min using extracted DNA. A set of 199 deep nasopharyngeal swabs (DNPS) collected from feedlot calves near the time of arrival were selected based on bacterial culture (BC) results for Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for tulathromycin, tilmicosin, tildipirosin, or gamithromycin. Samples were also tested for the same targets using RPA and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In samples that were culture-positive for one or more macrolide-resistant BRD-associated bacteria (n = 101), msrE-mphE and/or erm42 were detected in 95% of cases using RPA. The remaining 98 samples were either culture-negative, or the recovered bacteria were macrolide-susceptible: 43% of these were RPA-positive for at least one macrolide ARG. Together with BC-AST and PCR, Bayesian latent class modelling estimated the clinical sensitivity of RPA for macrolide ARGs to be 95% and specificity to be 58%, with moderate agreement between RPA and BC-AST (κ = 0.52) or PCR (κ = 0.55). The estimated sensitivity of the RPA multiplex assay for the targeted macrolide ARGs was very good, although estimated specificity was limited. However, Sanger sequencing confirmed RPA detection of msrE-mphE in BC-AST/PCR-negative samples (n = 23), reflecting the presence of this locus in non-target bacteria, as well as potential ARG variants among BRD bacteria. These findings support the potential of RPA for rapid ARG detection from extracted DNA. Continued assay optimization and evaluation for detection of respiratory bacteria and ARGs will further enhance its diagnostic utility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".