MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416139153 · doi:10.3390/vetsci12111079

Novel Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay Is Sensitive for Detection of Macrolide Resistance Genes Relevant to Bovine Respiratory Disease Management in Feedlot Calves

2025· article· en· W4416139153 on OpenAlex
Tara Funk, Lianne McLeod, Cheyenne C. Conrad, Rahat Zaheer, Simon J. G. Otto, Cheryl Waldner, Tim A. McAllister

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersGenome PrairieBeef Cattle Research CouncilUniversity of SaskatchewanBeef Farmers of OntarioGenome AlbertaMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsBovine respiratory diseaseRecombinase Polymerase AmplificationSanger sequencingPolymerase chain reactionMultiplex polymerase chain reactionMultiplexBacteriaAntimicrobialTaqMan

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Macrolides are crucial for the management and treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD). However, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens the efficacy of these and other antimicrobials. We developed real-time recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assays targeting three clinically relevant macrolide antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs)—msrE-mphE and erm42—in ≤30 min using extracted DNA. A set of 199 deep nasopharyngeal swabs (DNPS) collected from feedlot calves near the time of arrival were selected based on bacterial culture (BC) results for Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for tulathromycin, tilmicosin, tildipirosin, or gamithromycin. Samples were also tested for the same targets using RPA and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In samples that were culture-positive for one or more macrolide-resistant BRD-associated bacteria (n = 101), msrE-mphE and/or erm42 were detected in 95% of cases using RPA. The remaining 98 samples were either culture-negative, or the recovered bacteria were macrolide-susceptible: 43% of these were RPA-positive for at least one macrolide ARG. Together with BC-AST and PCR, Bayesian latent class modelling estimated the clinical sensitivity of RPA for macrolide ARGs to be 95% and specificity to be 58%, with moderate agreement between RPA and BC-AST (κ = 0.52) or PCR (κ = 0.55). The estimated sensitivity of the RPA multiplex assay for the targeted macrolide ARGs was very good, although estimated specificity was limited. However, Sanger sequencing confirmed RPA detection of msrE-mphE in BC-AST/PCR-negative samples (n = 23), reflecting the presence of this locus in non-target bacteria, as well as potential ARG variants among BRD bacteria. These findings support the potential of RPA for rapid ARG detection from extracted DNA. Continued assay optimization and evaluation for detection of respiratory bacteria and ARGs will further enhance its diagnostic utility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it