MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416139917 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1269

NCOG-02. Conquering Infant Medulloblastoma in Resource-Limited Settings: Challenges, Opportunities, and Treatment Outcomes

2025· article· en· W4416139917 on OpenAlexaff
Nisreen Amayiri, Eman Khattab, Maysa Al-Hussaini Maysa Al-Hussaini, Mayada Abu Shanab, Awni Musharbash, Mouness Obeidat, Bayan Maraqa, Hasan Hashem, Ahmad Kh. Ibrahimi, Rawad Rihani, Nasim Sarhan, Éric Bouffet

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaRadiation therapyChemotherapyDiseaseKarnofsky Performance StatusClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Infant medulloblastoma presents a unique set of challenges, characterized by high recurrence rates and significant neurodevelopmental risks associated with craniospinal radiation (CSI). There is a scarcity of data on the outcomes achieved in LMICs, therefore we share our experience at KHCC/Jordan. METHODS Retrospective chart review was conducted for infants <5years old diagnosed with medulloblastoma (2010-2023). We extracted their clinical characteristics, tumor attributes, and treatment modalities. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were identified (21 males,78%). The median age was 2years (0.5-4.3years). Twelve tumors (44%) underwent gross resection. Seventeen patients (63%) needed ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Seven (26%) developed postoperative complications. Fourteen tumors (52%) were metastatic. Ten tumors were of classic histology, eight desmoplastic, six anaplastic and three MBEN. Sixteen tumors (59%) were sub-grouped: SHH(fourteen), Group-3(two). Patients received various treatment protocols: HeadStart 1&2 (eleven), SKK-92 without IT-MTX (eight), ACNS0334 with single ASCT (six), and BBSFOP (two). Twenty-one patients were supposed to receive ASCT, however only thirteen did (three received SKK-92 due to financial constraints, two prematurely stopped therapy, two developed early tumor progression and one shifted to BBSFOP protocol due to chemotherapy toxicity). Seventeen patients (63%) are alive at a median of 5.2years (1.8-15.5years). Twelve patients are alive in CR1 without radiotherapy (5 without ASCT), two in CR2 after CSI-36Gy and one in CR3 after ASCT then CSI-23.4Gy. One patient lost to follow-up, and one is alive with disease at palliative care. Two patients developed secondary tumors, one died from thalamic high-grade glioma and one developed thyroid carcinoma. Two survivors needed cataract surgery, and four have hearing deficits. Ten survivors need hormonal supplements mostly growth hormone. CONCLUSIONS A subset of infants with medulloblastoma can be cured, even in LMICs, without ASCT or radiotherapy, however these treatments remain vital salvage options. Survivors require ongoing support to ensure optimal long-term quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→