MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416140417 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0702

DDDR-65. Dynamic and multi-omic profiling of glioblastoma to guide personalized medicine

2025· article· en· W4416140417 on OpenAlexaff
Maleeha Qazi, Laura M. Richards, Trevor J. Pugh, Amanda Khoo, Laura Kuhlmann, Thomas Kislinger, Jüri Reimand, Chitra Venugopal, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomidePersonalized medicineGlioblastomaChemoradiotherapyPrecision medicineTumor microenvironmentRegimenProfiling (computer programming)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with a median survival of only 15 months. Despite rigorous multimodal therapy including surgery, radiation, and temozolomide (TMZ), 96% of patients experience relapse within seven to nine months post diagnosis. Currently there is no standardized treatment for recurrent GBM (rGBM) and treatment failure is driven by extensive intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity. While the biology of treatment-naïve primary GBM (pGBM) is well studied, the evolution of GBM under therapy-induced selective pressure is not fully understood. This study utilizes a validated preclinical model to predict the molecular trajectory of a patient’s recurrence and develop a personalized therapeutic regimen before relapse. METHODS We performed an integrated multi-omic analysis (whole-genome sequencing, single-cell RNA sequencing, and proteomics) on a patient’s matched primary and recurrent GBM samples. In parallel, we generated a therapy-adapted patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of the patient’s treatment plan to predict tumor evolution. Upon establishing the pGBM PDX, we implemented a three-arm study: (1) control, (2) TMZ chemoradiotherapy and (3) TMZ chemoradiotherapy with ABT414 (anti-EGFR ADC as primary GBM had EGFR overexpression). RESULTS In vivo studies demonstrated significant survival benefits in treated mice compared to controls, however, mice receiving ABT-414 relapsed earlier. Omic profiling of rGBM revealed increased immunosuppressive macrophages and proteins that suppress the anti-GBM immune response compared to pGBM.Single-cell RNA sequencing identified Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) as a key regulator of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in rGBM. As IDO1 is implicated in mediating resistance to PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade, its inhibition in combination with PD-1 therapy may overcome immune resistance, presenting a personalized therapeutic target for this patient. CONCLUSION In summary, we established a predictive disease model, gaining insights into GBM’s evolution and identifying actionable targets in the patient’s rGBM, offering potential strategies to overcome treatment resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207