Lebrikizumab Treatment Improves Lichenification and Other Clinical Signs of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe AD and Skin of Color
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The ADmirable (NCT05372419) Phase 3b clinical trial was the first lebrikizumab (LEBRI) study in adults and adolescents with atopic dermatitis (AD) and skin of color (SOC), a historically underrepresented patient population in clinical trials. We conducted a post-hoc analysis to assess improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) clinical signs across four body regions with LEBRI in ADmirable at 24 weeks. Methods In the ADmirable trial, 90 adults and adolescents (≥12 to <18 years; weight ≥40 kg) with moderate-to-severe AD who self-identified as non-White and had Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV-VI received open-label LEBRI 250 mg (500 mg loading dose at baseline [BL] and Week 2) every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Weeks 4-16. From Weeks 16-24, responders (Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2-point improvement or ≥75% improvement in EASI) received LEBRI 250 mg once every 4 weeks (Q4W); per-protocol non-responders continued with LEBRI 250 mg Q2W. Least-squares mean (LSM) of percent change from BL was analyzed using mixed model repeated measures with observed data; Q2W and Q4W populations were pooled Weeks 16-24. Concomitant low and mid-potency TCS and TCI use was allowed. Patients requiring rescue therapy were discontinued. EASI severity score assessed the intensity of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification in four regions (head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities) with 0 being absent, 1 mild, 2 moderate, and 3 severe. Results BL lichenification scores were lower in head/neck and trunk (1.7, 1.9, respectively) vs. upper and lower extremities (2.2 each). Erythema, edema/papulation, and excoriation followed a similar trend at BL. With LEBRI, LSM percent improvements were observed in each clinical sign over all body regions at Week 16 and were maintained or improved through Week 24. Lichenification scores decreased by 72.4% (head/neck), 73.1% (trunk), 59.5% (upper extremities), and 66.1% (lower extremities) by Week 16; and 76.0%, 78.9%, 72.1%, and 75.3%, respectively, at Week 24. The other clinical signs of AD showed similar improvement across all body regions at Week 16 and were maintained or further improved by Week 24. Conclusions Lebrikizumab improved each clinical sign of skin severity assessed by EASI across all body regions in patients with moderate-to-severe AD and SOC, including lichenification, which may be more prominent in this understudied population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".