Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 244-Week Results From the KEEPsAKE 2 Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction & Objectives: This analysis aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of risankizumab (RZB) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) through week 244 of the KEEPsAKE 2 trial. Materials & Methods: KEEPsAKE 2 is an ongoing, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial in patients with active PsA and previous intolerance or inadequate response to 1 or 2 biological therapies (Bio-IR) and/or ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive RZB 150 mg or placebo (PBO) for a 24-week double-blind period. By week 28, all patients were switched to open-label RZB and administered the study drug every 12 weeks thereafter. Safety and efficacy were assessed in all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of RZB. Statistical analyses included nonresponder imputation incorporating multiple imputation (NRI-MI) for binary endpoints and multiple mixed response model (MMRM) for continuous endpoints. Safety assessments based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are summarized using exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs, events/100 patient-years [E/100PYs]). Results: Patients on open-label RZB maintained similar efficacy results at week 244 as those reported previously at weeks 24, 52, 100, 148, and 196. At week 244, 49.6% of patients initially randomized to RZB and 42.9% of patients who switched from PBO to RZB (PBO/RZB) achieved ACR20; 30.4% on RZB and 28.3% on PBO/RZB achieved ACR50; 19.2% on RZB and 15.5% on PBO/RZB achieved ACR70; 29.9% on RZB and 27.4% on PBO/RZB achieved minimal disease activity (MDA). Among patients with baseline psoriasis severity affecting ≥ 3% body surface area, 61.8% on RZB and 52.1% on PBO/RZB achieved a 90% improvement in psoriasis area severity index (PASI90). Among patients with enthesitis or dactylitis at baseline, 45.6% on RZB and 42.4% on PBO/RZB achieved resolution of enthesitis (Leeds Enthesitis Index = 0), and 70.0% on RZB and 47.4% on PBO/RZB achieved resolution of dactylitis (Leeds Dactylitis Index = 0). For patients with a baseline HAQ-DI score ≥ 0.35, clinically meaningful improvements occurred in 33.2% on RZB and 32.1% on PBO/RZB. Week 244 safety assessments were consistent with those from the 24-week placebo-controlled study and through the open-label extension period: overall TEAEs (165.8 E/100PYs), serious TEAEs (9.7 E/100PYs), and any TEAE leading to discontinuation of RZB (1.5 E/100PYs). Conclusion: Long-term treatment with RZB demonstrates durable efficacy and a consistent safety profile through 244 weeks for adult patients with active PsA and inadequate response to biological therapies and/or csDMARD(s).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".