MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416146608 · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006936

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Trauma 2007–2019: Comprehensive Patient and Center-Level Retrospective Cohort Analysis

2025· article· en· W4416146608 on OpenAlexaff
Zhi Geng, Allyson M. Hynes, Alexis M. Moren, Jason D. Christie, Nilam S. Mangalmurti, Pengxiang Li, John J. Gallagher, Benjamin S. Abella, Jason Nam, Daniela Schmulevich, Avery B. Nathens, Patrick M. Reilly, David Zonies, Lewis J. Kaplan, Jeremy W. Cannon

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsARDSRetrospective cohort studyAcute respiratory distressRespiratory distressCohort studyCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents a significant complication in trauma patients. Yet the epidemiology of ARDS in trauma remains incompletely characterized. We sought to define trends in ARDS frequency and the effect of temporal, patient, and center-level factors on outcomes with the hypothesis that ARDS independently predicts mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hospitals submitting data to the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. PATIENTS: Injured patients 18 years old or older from 2007 to 2019 on mechanical ventilation (MV) for greater than or equal to 2 days were included, and patients with ARDS were compared with those without ARDS. A subgroup with transfusion data was also identified. Multivariable logistic regression models by year adjusted for patient demographics, center characteristics, and blood products identified factors independently associated with ARDS diagnosis and 30-day hospital mortality. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 384,032 injured patients on MV, ARDS was documented in 29,359 (8 per 100 MV patients) with a significant decrease over the study period (22 in 2007 vs. 3 in 2019, p < 0.001). Patient-level risk factors independently associated with ARDS were blunt injury (odds ratio [OR] 1.25; 95% CI, 1.20-1.30), severe sepsis (OR 2.16; 95% CI, 2.06-2.27), ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR 2.91; 95% CI, 2.82-3.00), and acute kidney injury (AKI, OR 2.98; 95% CI, 2.85 to 3.12). In the transfusion subset, 24-hour plasma (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and platelets (OR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05) were independently associated with ARDS. Crude ARDS mortality increased over the study period (2007, 15.1% vs. 2019, 29.7%, p < 0.001), and after adjusting for significant differences, ARDS was independently associated with 30-day hospital mortality (OR 1.32; 95% CI, 1.27-1.37). Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with ARDS included head injury (OR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.43-1.66), severe sepsis (OR 1.48; 95% CI, 1.34-1.63), and AKI (OR 2.72; 95% CI, 2.50-2.96). Patients with ARDS managed in Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization centers were less likely to die (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: From 2007 to 2019, ARDS decreased significantly in trauma patients. Over the same time, mortality increased to nearly 30%, and after adjusting for other risks factors, ARDS was strongly associated with 30-day mortality. Future studies should examine modifiable patient and center-level factors to improve mortality in these high-risk patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207