MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416146794 · doi:10.2196/77185

Youth-Centered Mobile Intervention (Next4You) to Promote Healthy Relationships and Sexual Wellness Among Adolescents in or Transitioning From Foster Care: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4416146794 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Pamela M. Anderson, Seow Ling Ong, Dallas J. Elgin, Jennifer Laird, David Oc. Starr, Karin Coyle

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsLinnaeus Plant Sciences (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialIntervention (counseling)Reproductive healthProtocol (science)mHealthIntervention mappingHealth educationSexual behavior

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: National birth rates among adolescents have consistently decreased since 1991, yet substantial disparities remain, particularly among youth in foster care, who experience higher risks of unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections. Few sexual health programs rarely address the specific needs of foster youth or incorporate youth perspectives into their design, development, and implementation. Objective: This study aims to refine, pilot-test, and evaluate Next4You, a fully mobile, youth-centered sexual health education platform tailored specifically for adolescents in or transitioning from foster care. The program intends to reduce sexual risk behaviors and related psychosocial outcomes by promoting healthy relationships, sexual wellness, contraception use, communication skills, self-respect, and wellness education. Methods: Next4You is a fully mobile, self-paced, 4-week intervention evaluated using an individual-level randomized controlled trial involving a target sample of 500 youths aged 16-19 years with current or previous foster care experience in California. Participants are randomly assigned to either the intervention group, which receives access to Next4You modules, or the comparison group, which accesses general health materials through a similar web platform. Both groups complete baseline, 3-month, and 9-month follow-up surveys. Immediately following the 9-month follow-up survey, participants in each group receive access to the platform they were not initially assigned. Data collection assesses contraceptive behaviors, sexual communication, consent self-efficacy, and knowledge related to health rights and financial literacy. Intervention engagement is tracked through platform analytics, and qualitative interviews supplement data collection. Data analysis will adhere to intent-to-treat principles, using multilevel regression models to assess impacts. Results: Funding was awarded in 2021, with institutional review board approval in October 2022. Intervention development lasted approximately 7 months, engaging foster youth in a co-design process to ensure relevance and cultural competence. Study recruitment began in September 2023, continuing until May 2025. Final data collection is anticipated by March 2026, followed by data analysis. Conclusions: Next4You presents an innovative approach to sexual health education by addressing critical gaps in sexual health education for foster youth through mobile technology. If effective, Next4You could provide another evidence-based option for promoting sexual health among foster youth, guiding policymakers and practitioners in adopting similar trauma-informed and youth-centered interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207