Impact of Pulmonary Tumor Burden in Favorable Histology Wilms Tumor Outcomes: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Study AREN0533
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE Children with favorable histology Wilms tumor (FHWT) with pulmonary metastases have inferior outcomes compared with those with localized disease. We evaluated the impact of pulmonary tumor burden within subgroups of similarly treated children with stage IV FHWT. METHODS Children with FHWT with pulmonary-only metastasis enrolled in AREN0533 were included. Lung nodule response assessment, by chest computed tomography after two cycles of vincristine/dactinomycin/doxorubicin (Regimen DD-4A) chemotherapy, identified rapid complete responses (RCRs) and slow incomplete pulmonary nodule responses (SIRs). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by number and size of pulmonary metastases within two cohorts: (1) RCR treated with additional DD-4A without lung radiation therapy (RT) and (2) SIR treated with the original three drugs plus cyclophosphamide/etoposide (Regimen M) with lung RT. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model for EFS and OS stratified by treatment assessed the impact of the number and size of pulmonary metastases adjusted for tumor 1q gain. RESULTS AREN0533 enrolled 288 children with stage IV pulmonary-only metastases, of whom 251 met inclusion criteria for outcome analyses. In the RCR cohort (n = 105), EFS and OS were not significantly different based on the number of lung metastases, whereas size of pulmonary metastases was significantly associated with EFS ( P = .022), but not OS. In the SIR cohort (n = 146), EFS and OS did not differ by the number or size of lung metastases. In multivariable models, neither number nor size of lung metastases was significantly associated with EFS or OS although 1q gain was significant (EFS P = .0015; OS P = .039) after adjustment for these factors. CONCLUSION 1q gain is a superior prognostic indicator to pulmonary tumor burden in patients with FHWT with pulmonary-only metastasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".