MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416157725 · doi:10.1177/03000605251391940

Oral contraceptives and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4416157725 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hejing Pan, Xuanlin Li, Lin Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Medical Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
KeywordsRheumatoid arthritisConfidence intervalRelative riskFunnel plotPublication biasMeta-analysisCohort studyPopulationCochrane Library

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives The relationship between the use of oral contraceptives and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis remains unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively evaluate the association between oral contraceptive use and rheumatoid arthritis risk. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for cohort studies published from 1980 to July 2024. Studies were assessed for bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-text articles and graded the certainty of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Data were analyzed using random effects models, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger test. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed, which demonstrated the robustness of the overall pooled estimate. Results Twelve cohort studies (1989–2024) with 1,126,554 participants were included. There was no significant overall association between oral contraceptive use and rheumatoid arthritis risk (relative risk = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.93–1.00, I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.920). However, subgroup analysis revealed that oral contraceptive use for ≤5 years was associated with a higher risk of rheumatoid arthritis (relative risk = 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.16, I 2 = 59.4%, p = 0.043). Current oral contraceptive use was linked to a reduced risk of rheumatoid arthritis (relative risk = 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.77–0.95, I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.840), while past oral contraceptive use showed no such association (relative risk = 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.87–1.02, I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.961). No publication bias was detected in the included studies ( p = 0.183, Egger test). Conclusions This meta-analysis found no overall protective effect of oral contraceptive use on the risk of rheumatoid arthritis but suggested that current oral contraceptive use may lower the risk. Caution must be exercised while interpreting these results, particularly in studies with shorter follow-up periods, wherein the association might be stronger.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International Medical ResearchSame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207