MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416160839 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1682213

Spatiotemporal dynamics of HIV-1 transmission networks in a major migration hub: integrated phylogenetic and molecular evidence

2025· article· en· W4416160839 on OpenAlexaff
Min Zhu, Junfang Chen, Zhou Sun, Ke Xu, Xingliang Zhang, Sisheng Wu, Ling Ye, Xiaojuan Xu, Wenjie Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogenetic treeTransmission (telecommunications)Key (lock)Dynamics (music)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Network dynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) cross-regional transmission poses a critical challenge in China, particularly in high-mobility metropolitan centers. This study aimed to characterize the transmission dynamics between Hangzhou—a megacity with 11.9 million residents (42% migrants)—and other Chinese regions using molecular epidemiology. Methods We analyzed 4,249 Hangzhou-derived and 50,898 non-Hangzhou HIV-1 pol sequences. Molecular transmission network analysis was used to identify transmission clusters, and phylogenetic and Bayesian analyses were conducted to explore lineage characteristics, origins, and expansion of major clusters. Results Molecular transmission network analysis identified 3,317 clusters, incorporating 43.5% (1,848/4,249) of Hangzhou sequences and 32.4% (16,511/50,898) of non-Hangzhou sequences. Crucially, 276 mixed-origin clusters bridged regions, comprising 1,222 (28.8%) Hangzhou and 8,954 (17.6%) non-Hangzhou individuals. Cross-regional connectivity was dominated by Shenzhen (48.1% of 46,962 edges), followed by Beijing (16.5%) and Guangzhou (7.9%). Multivariable regression revealed significantly higher odds of cross-regional connection for males versus females (aOR = 1.376, CI: 1.011–1.869, p = 0.043), homosexual transmission (aOR = 1.28, CI: 1.057–1.550, p = 0.009), non-residents (aOR = 1.207, CI: 1.040–1.402, p = 0.014), and first CD4 + T-cell count of 200–500 cells/uL (aOR = 1.348, CI: 1.057–1.718, p = 0.016). For subtypes, CRF07_BC and URF (CRF07_BC/CRF01_AE) demonstrated significant cross-regional spread versus other subtypes (aOR = 0.163–0.508, p < 0.001). Phylogenetic analysis of all Hangzhou CRF07_BC sequences identified two distinct lineages. Within the largest transmission CRF07_BC cluster, 99.5% of cross-regionally linked Hangzhou sequences (558/561) belonged to Lineage 1 indicating lineage 1 driving cross-regional spread. Bayesian dating indicated major URF clusters (HZC1-3, NHZ) originated between 2014 and 2020 (evolutionary rate: 1.73 × 10 −3 subs/site/year). Conclusion These findings identify key transmission routes connecting Hangzhou to economically developed regions and highlight CRF07_BC/URF strains and mobility as critical drivers. Targeted interventions disrupting these high-risk pathways are urgently needed to reduce regional HIV spread.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Microbiology→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→