Henry Bataille et la mise en crise du personnage ( <i>Maman Colibri</i> , <i>La femme nue</i> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Henry Bataille, dont le nom est tombé dans l’oubli, a connu un succès incontestable sur les scènes parisiennes au tournant du xx e siècle. Son oeuvre abondante est aujourd’hui rangée parmi les pièces de Boulevard ; elle annonce pourtant l’avènement du drame moderne et contemporain. L’analyse de deux de ses chefs-d’oeuvre, Maman Colibri (1904) et La femme nue (1908), permet de constater que quelques-uns de leurs procédés mettent en question la forme canonique du drame, dont la charpente classique est brisée par l’intrusion d’éléments épiques qui se manifestent dans les récits des personnages. Le dramaturge déplace ainsi l’action dramatique vers l’étude des âmes souffrantes. Des séquences narratives récurrentes changent le statut du personnage qui, dépourvu d’attributs actifs et de traits immobiles, semble surplomber l’action afin de se focaliser sur ses réflexions souvent de nature ontologique. L’étude de ces deux oeuvres met en valeur l’évolution du personnage agissant qui tend à s’effacer derrière le personnage récitant , témoin de la fragilité de son existence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".