Mulheres negras 60+: histórias de vida na velhice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo discute a velhice de mulheres negras brasileiras, entendendo-a como um fenômeno biopsicossocial e destacando dimensões históricas, culturais e políticas do racismo estrutural que historicamente vitima essas mulheres. A fundamentação teórica apoia-se, entre outras(os), em bell hooks, Lélia Gonzalez e Sueli Carneiro. O objetivo é analisar as histórias de vida narradas por mulheres negras 60+, a partir de uma abordagem interseccional entre experiências de racismo, machismo, questões de gênero e idadismo, conferindo visibilidade a processos históricos, culturais e ideológicos assentados no racismo brasileiro e seus desdobramentos para a velhice. A metodologia é qualitativa, com análise narrativa de histórias de vida, em diálogo com a Escrevivência de Conceição Evaristo e com os estudos de Ecléa Bosi sobre memória e velhice. Conclui-se que o racismo no Brasil incide de modo particularmente perverso na vida das mulheres negras, agravando danos à saúde mental na velhice. Ainda assim, mesmo diante das iniquidades, mulheres negras brasileiras 60+ exercem protagonismo, lideram suas famílias e constroem processos de resistência antirracista, afirmando a defesa da emancipação e da liberdade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".