MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416186439 · doi:10.2196/75202

Influencing Factors of New Nurses’ Competency Following Participation in a Preceptorship Program: Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4416186439 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lusia Dian Wahyu Winarti, Krisna Yetti, Tuti Afriani, Enie Novieastari

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreceptorCompetence (human resources)Professional developmentMEDLINEContinuing professional development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Preceptorship programs have been implemented in several hospitals across Indonesia to support new nurses during their transition period in the workplace. Many factors influence new nurses successfully transitioning into this new role. However, few studies have examined the factors that affect new nurses' competency. Objective: This study aimed to identify the factors influencing the competency of new nurses in a preceptorship program. Methods: This study used a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design. Participants were 169 nurses who had been employed for less than 1 year in 2 hospitals. Participants were nurses undergoing an orientation period who were part of a preceptorship program. The study used instruments developed by the researchers and their team, which were tested for validity and reliability. The variables were self-efficacy, new nurses' adaptation, preceptor commitment, preceptor competency, and mentoring method. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the χ2 test, and multiple logistic regression. Results: The median age of the 169 participants was 24 years, with the ages ranging from 22 to 30 years. Most of the participants were female (n=136, 80.5%), held a bachelor's degree (n=164, 97%), and had worked at Hospital X for 0 to 6 months (n=128, 75.7%). In terms of training experience, most participants had completed Basic Cardiac Life Support training (n=142, 84%). The independent variables that influenced new nurses' competency were gender (P=.02), training (P=.05), mentoring method (P=.001), preceptor commitment (P=.03), and preceptor competency (P=.001). A multiple logistic regression test further indicated that the mentoring method (P=.001; α=.05; OR .198), preceptor commitment (P=.03; α=.05; OR .296), and preceptor competency (P=.001; α=.05; OR .202) were influential variables for new nurses' competency. Conclusions: The mentoring method, preceptor commitment, and preceptor competency were identified as the factors that most strongly influence new nurses' competency. These results can be used to develop more effective preceptor programs. An effective preceptorship program requires preceptors who demonstrate both professional competence and personal characteristics. Preceptors have to possess adequate knowledge and skills to support the development of new nurses' competency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian/Pacific Island Nursing JournalSame topicNursing education and managementFrench-language works237,207