Whole-Genome Analysis of Escherichia coli from One Health Sources: Evaluating Genetic Relatedness and Antimicrobial Resistance Carriage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Due to the numerical dominance of environmental and commensal strains, understanding antimicrobial resistance (AMR) transmission in Escherichia coli requires consideration of non-clinical as well as pathogenic isolates. In this cross-sectional study, associations between the genetic context of non-clinical E. coli and AMR carriage are examined in isolates sampled from different niches within a One Health continuum. Methods: Two hundred eighty-eight E. coli isolates collected in Alberta, Canada (2018–2019) from wastewater, well water, feces of broiler chickens and feedlot cattle, and retail beef and chicken meat were selected from existing surveillance collections using a stratified random sampling structure. Using short-read whole genome assemblies, phylogenetic relationships were inferred from pan-genome multiple sequence alignments. Principal coordinate analysis and permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) of a Jaccard dissimilarity matrix derived from gene presence/absence data were used to investigate contributions of source and AMR strata to observe genetic dissimilarity. Population clustering and gene under- or over-representation by source and cluster were also explored. Results: Minimal phylogenetic segregation of isolates was noted based on source or AMR strata, and both contributed significant but small proportions of observed genetic dissimilarity, with the largest proportion attributed to phylogroup. There was notable diversity of E. coli within and between sources; however, in some larger clusters, differential gene presence/absence was potentially linked to ecological niche rather than source of isolation. Conclusions: This study highlights the ecological complexity of AMR in E. coli in non-clinical contexts, offering a novel lens on how niche-specific factors can influence population structure and AMR carriage. It also provides insight into apparent discrepancies in the literature regarding clustering of E. coli by source. These findings support a more integrative One Health approach to AMR surveillance, emphasizing the need to account for microbial diversity and niche-specific adaptation across interconnected systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".